14-24mm nikon or 17-35mm 2.8? anyone? help...
- Thread starter mlvglb
- Start date
Are u using FX or DX?
On FX, the 14-24mm might be abit too wide as a one zoom staple lens.
On FX the 24-70mm is a great option, the 24mm covers a table shot, while the 70mm gives a little isolation.
( one of the fav for wedding photog was the 17-55mm DX lens on a DX sensor )
Different folks different strokes, u will find folks who swear by either above mentioned.
Ryan
On FX, the 14-24mm might be abit too wide as a one zoom staple lens.
On FX the 24-70mm is a great option, the 24mm covers a table shot, while the 70mm gives a little isolation.
( one of the fav for wedding photog was the 17-55mm DX lens on a DX sensor )
Different folks different strokes, u will find folks who swear by either above mentioned.
Ryan
Not to mention too heavy and intimidating with that protruding large round front element... :bigeyes:
But it makes you look more pro leh:bsmilie:
More pro, but with broken arm. :bsmilie:
the 14-24 is really :thumbsup:.
probably you should try using one before deciding.
extremely sharp. no issues shooting at f/2.8 during a ballroom function.
bad thing is the weight, as well as the huge front element (cannot attach filter).
probably you should try using one before deciding.
extremely sharp. no issues shooting at f/2.8 during a ballroom function.
bad thing is the weight, as well as the huge front element (cannot attach filter).
Similar threads
