There are 2 parts to this thread.
Part 1 - What HDR software do you use and what is your workflow?
Part 2 - What kind of HDR image is desirable?
I have been trying out the below 3 softwares
1) HDR Luminance 2.01
2) Picturenaut 3.0
3) Photomatix 4.0
HDR Luminance crash everytime I do tone mapping so I stopped using it. Anyone has the same problem with it crashing?
Picturenaut do not have details about what the various adjustments do so not too sure if I am doing anything right. Furthermore, it says to have to convert raw to tiff before processing. Anyone knows how to use it? It is afterall a freeware.
So left with Photomatix. It is simple enough to use. However, it does not mentioned if processing in raw will give best IQ, or have to convert to tiff like Picturenaut. Also the enhanced, compressed and fusion tone mapping left me thinking what we are using HDR for - to have a dramatic high detailed or a natural looking image. The former look more picturesque but it is not what the eye sees.
Part 1 - What HDR software do you use and what is your workflow?
Part 2 - What kind of HDR image is desirable?
I have been trying out the below 3 softwares
1) HDR Luminance 2.01
2) Picturenaut 3.0
3) Photomatix 4.0
HDR Luminance crash everytime I do tone mapping so I stopped using it. Anyone has the same problem with it crashing?
Picturenaut do not have details about what the various adjustments do so not too sure if I am doing anything right. Furthermore, it says to have to convert raw to tiff before processing. Anyone knows how to use it? It is afterall a freeware.
So left with Photomatix. It is simple enough to use. However, it does not mentioned if processing in raw will give best IQ, or have to convert to tiff like Picturenaut. Also the enhanced, compressed and fusion tone mapping left me thinking what we are using HDR for - to have a dramatic high detailed or a natural looking image. The former look more picturesque but it is not what the eye sees.
Last edited: