Medal of honor Vs Call of Duty Series
- Thread starter tokrot
- Start date
Both are equally bad...
Infinity ward walked out of Activision, and treyarch has been and always will be lousy.
EA too.
I stopped playing these when they got too greedy with the money, releasing DLCs and new versions with only some changes. And they're overpriced. The only shooters I felt that were worth buying were CS (which I don't play now), and Team Fortress 2, an awesome US$20 game which is already running for 2 years and still releasing new updates and content for free (they have a store which you can buy stuff using real money but those don't affect gameplay much, and most of them can be gotten by simply playing and waiting). This is what other game developers should do. Release new content for free, not suck the money dry out of people and making them pay US$20 for one new map or something like that.
i'm fine with the MW series. so far i found it meaningful. at least the story line is exciting.
CS is passe. it gets too repetitive. MW campaign has a nice story to it.
Well, Call of Duty 4 has been and always will be the best of the COD series. Its one of the two games Infinity Ward made. As for COD6, its not as great as COD4 because Money-sucking Activision forced IW to make rubbish storyline. The rest of the COD series are all unenjoyable because of Treyarch. As for MoH, all of its games are *utter rubbish*.
Between the 2, i said Call of Duty - Modern Warfare is the better; keeps you on the edge.
However the figures seems to zip around like comic figures and it feels like you are still playing in the 'counter strike' generation.
However in the battle collections league, Battle Field - Bad Company 2 stands out the best overall. Mother of all infantry battle games. Most notably for the thrill of high definition realism and the wide assortment of weapons selection and vehicles (land & air); especially the apache AH64.
Call of Duty still the best game ever played... :thumbsup:
Playing MoH, jus aint fightin for war type of game. More like tomb raider/Resident evil type of game.. :bsmilie:
Playing MoH, jus aint fightin for war type of game. More like tomb raider/Resident evil type of game.. :bsmilie:
Which one is better?? :embrass:
For some reasons, I dont like the "modern warfare games" - I mean nowadays wars, not the MW series by COD. MOH series were the FPS I prefered (becos of graphics) until I tried COD:WAW, then I shifted over to COD:WAW for more realistic graphics.
But now with both series in terrorist warfare, I think I stop first until another series comes out with WWII or Vietnam War
Nothing beats gibbing people with an airshot :thumbsup:
Now still got people play CS Source meh
Well Guys, I'm currently playing two of them. Medal of Honor and Modern Warfare: Black Ops. Both of them are almost equally exciting. I'm tending more to MOH due to more realistic fighting. Black Ops storyline is abit confusing but I will give my final verdict after completing two of them.
For some reasons, I dont like the "modern warfare games" - I mean nowadays wars, not the MW series by COD. MOH series were the FPS I prefered (becos of graphics) until I tried COD:WAW, then I shifted over to COD:WAW for more realistic graphics.
But now with both series in terrorist warfare, I think I stop first until another series comes out with WWII or Vietnam War
In MW: BO, there's a campaign fighting the NV. Very intense. I think you would like it. But now I think MOH is more like MW now..Maybe cos BO is not by infinityward? :bsmilie:
This is what I agree. The flashing part made me almost puke.. :bsmilie: But I have been playing for 3 days and switched back to MOH. Let me finish one of them first.. hehe;p
which is a good thing. i prefer the SAS style missions compared to the normal infantry war ones.
Similar threads
