No! theres no D700x .. just a D700s

[garbled]

But seriously rumors are spreading like wildfire that nikon is releasing its new line of FX camera D700s....D700s!...S?! We don't want your "S" .. There's no D700x Like its big brother D3X 24mpix but yes we're still stuck at 12Mpix with video capabilities as a new feature...

But seriously Nikon,,,Sony, Canon, I think Pentax? has produced higher megapix fullframes at the same price range as your d700...can you give us something more? I mean who cares about your video capabilities. :angry:

But hey Nikon...I still love you.

Just a kopitiam rant... peace all.

 

[leowyien]

Go write tht to nikon

 

[ricsal]

Pentax no Fulframe. Only MF.

 

[Francis247]

Go out and shoot more.
Worry less about the Megapixel or function.
Less grumble and stay happy with what you have.
Do what you can do, don't do what people do.

 

[wildcat]

Actually I chose Nikon because they not increasing their pixel density, choosing to stick with 12MP. If I wanted to go high MP, I would have chosen Canon

 

[DrSpock]

I chose D700 for it's excellent high ISO performance (and the cheaper FX) and if more pixel density means more noise(is usually the case) then I'm glad to stick to D700 so who cares about HD video or what crap they'l add to the D700x/s/z/whatever, i have the latest Sony HD with 64G HDD & super bright sensor to use for that movie time:devil:

 

[bousozoku]

Pentax no Fulframe. Only MF.

You write that as if Medium format is a bad thing. It's just too bad superior image quality costs so much.

Go out and shoot more.
Worry less about the Megapixel or function.
Less grumble and stay happy with what you have.
Do what you can do, don't do what people do.

Exactly. Too many people worry about numbers and what other people think and never discover what their camera equipment will do on its own.