This thread should be deleted, clearly fictional.
And your proof of that claim is ... ?
hahahae. he doesnt know luminous landscape...
This thread should be deleted, clearly fictional.
Perhaps ... oki, let me ask again, where's the irrevocable, irrefutable, substantiated cast-in-stone proof of your claim simranjits?
Or is this just another feeble attempt to trol and bait like in other threads?
I mean we should be wary of all these editorials, could be sponsored by any one camera maker to throw another into disrepute. Etc bad QC or bad design. These are obviously cleverly engineered. We wouldn't know for sure of course . But it doesn't harm to be a bit skeptical.
This thread should be deleted, clearly biased.
Edit: changed fictional to biased.
You are aware that LL is well-known for being UNBIASED, right? That the equipment he brings along is usually paid for out of his own pocket, rather than sponsored?
I'm just saying we should take it with a pinch of salt, a little bit of skepticism is always healthy. Its not a meaningful statistic by any stretch.
Its not a meaningful statistic by any stretch.
He never said it was. It was a straight-up report of what worked, what didn't.
Well we should rather think about why he would post such a thing, his slant towards sony is unsettling somewhat. It could be a big PR thing for Sony instead. Recent evidence points to this , if you look at his past articles. Oh well it's just the feeling i'm getting.
This thread should be deleted, clearly biased.
Edit: changed fictional to biased.
He has ALWAYS done it for all expeditions. As for his posts about Sony, that's simply because the A900 is the camera he's currently using. And if you read a bit more, you'll see him go totally ecstatic about the 60MP Phase one back.