Decission to make abt the lens


Status
Not open for further replies.

Mrkcw

Senior Member
Jan 5, 2008
638
0
16
41
hi...i got problem again...since i failed to sell my 18-55 VR kit lens to get my desire 18-135...i would like to keep my lens...18-200vr is too expensive for me...the reason i want to get a more range lens is next week i will go to sarawak....

so wht will all of u do if u were me....
1)keep the lens and bought a 55-200VR (for me....lazy to change sometime)
2)continue to seek for 18-135 and sell the kit lens....
3)save the money for 18-200vr...

another thins is i found im not so like to zoom more...mayb i was limited by the lens....
so i do consider to change my kit to 4)Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 also...

thx all...
 

hi...i got problem again...since i failed to sell my 18-55 VR kit lens to get my desire 18-135...i would like to keep my lens...18-200vr is too expensive for me...the reason i want to get a more range lens is next week i will go to sarawak....

so wht will all of u do if u were me....
1)keep the lens and bought a 55-200VR (for me....lazy to change sometime)
2)continue to seek for 18-135 and sell the kit lens....
3)save the money for 18-200vr...

another thins is i found im not so like to zoom more...mayb i was limited by the lens....
so i do consider to change my kit to 4)Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 also...

thx all...

DUDE, if 18-200 is too expensive, then tamron 17-50 f2.8 not too expensive?

18-135mm kit lens is being sold all over the place in the B&S section for about 300.
 

well...the Tamron 17-50 is $300-$400 cheaper....;p

but yea, might as well save up for the 18-200VR, provided you don't need a fast lens :)



as for me, since i'm going into concert photography...i need a fast lens..so i'll get the tammy 1st
 

well...the Tamron 17-50 is $300-$400 cheaper....;p

but yea, might as well save up for the 18-200VR, provided you don't need a fast lens :)



as for me, since i'm going into concert photography...i need a fast lens..so i'll get the tammy 1st

true. well holidays tend to require less fast lenses (unless you suay suay kenna monsoon seasonish weather)
 

if you selling your kit lens at 200, surely got some ppl will buy one, since is already a very low-ball price.
if you need more cash for your next lens purchase, then i suggest you go find a temp-job instead.
hoping to get more for your kit lens is not that easy especially when plenty of them selling it right now.
 

how many time you really need the extra range beyond 55mm seriously?

does it really justify to change your lens if money is an issue?
 

how many time you really need the extra range beyond 55mm seriously?

does it really justify to change your lens if money is an issue?
seldom....only use it in church to shoot ppl potrait....actually i want a 85mm f/1.8...but my camera cannot focus on tht.....mine is nikon d60...so sianz...consider change my camera...maybe a 2nd hand D80..
 

seldom....only use it in church to shoot ppl potrait....actually i want a 85mm f/1.8...but my camera cannot focus on tht.....mine is nikon d60...so sianz...consider change my camera...maybe a 2nd hand D80..
if seldom, just shoot whatever you can and crop it.

imagine a $300 lens, using it less than 10 time a year, cost is $30 per use, top up a little more you can rent a 70~210 f2.8 for a day to play.
 

Er, why not just get the 55-200 VR? The whole point of an SLR system is to change lenses according to relevant usage. The right lens for the right job.

If your only excuse for not getting the lens is "lazy to change", maybe a change of mentality would do you better.
 

Er, why not just get the 55-200 VR? The whole point of an SLR system is to change lenses according to relevant usage. The right lens for the right job.

If your only excuse for not getting the lens is "lazy to change", maybe a change of mentality would do you better.[/QUO
i consider to get nikon 18-135 for extra range and cheaper than 18-200....and i want to get a prime...but cannot auto focus in my lens....another question is wht is the purpose to get a flash???if i seldom shoot in concert...etc...should i need a flash...thx
 

Er, why not just get the 55-200 VR? The whole point of an SLR system is to change lenses according to relevant usage. The right lens for the right job.

If your only excuse for not getting the lens is "lazy to change", maybe a change of mentality would do you better.[/QUO
i consider to get nikon 18-135 for extra range and cheaper than 18-200....and i want to get a prime...but cannot auto focus in my lens....another question is wht is the purpose to get a flash???if i seldom shoot in concert...etc...should i need a flash...thx


i tink u are very very confused.

please, stop thinking about buying anything, bring your camera and kit lens out and shoot some real pics.
 

i think TS is more handicapped by his mindset than his cam.

if you know d60 couldn't AF with cheap nikon primes, then you shouldn't buy it in the 1st place.
i know what i was getting into when i bought the d40, that is lack of AF with primes.

the tarmon lens is good but are you willing to pay 620 for it ?
be it d60 or d80 the new tarmon version of 17-50mm f2.8 comes with lens motor so surely will AF one on the d60.
 

i consider to get nikon 18-135 for extra range and cheaper than 18-200....and i want to get a prime...but cannot auto focus in my lens....another question is wht is the purpose to get a flash???if i seldom shoot in concert...etc...should i need a flash...thx

Erm, is it not obvious enough that if you don't know the purpose for buying something, you don't need it and hence you should not buy it?
 

It's always nice to have new toys.

good point :bsmilie: (i'm a little guilty of that too :sweat:)


to TS: really can't help you here :sweat: you need to decide for yourself.What's your budget btw?



as for what a flash does, a flash is essentially essential. you buy a SB-900 and take WOW pictures with it ;)
 

I've got a 18-55mm and a 55-200mm; and in the last 4 months, the number of times I've found it necessary to change from one of these two lens to the other can be counted on one hand... maybe. :)

In all seriousness, I've found the 18-55mm to suit 90% of the (general) photography I do as an amateur. The only shoots I require longer reach of 200mm are also the times I don't need the 18-55mm at all.:)
 

Last edited:
i think TS is more handicapped by his mindset than his cam.

if you know d60 couldn't AF with cheap nikon primes, then you shouldn't buy it in the 1st place.
i know what i was getting into when i bought the d40, that is lack of AF with primes.

the tarmon lens is good but are you willing to pay 620 for it ?
be it d60 or d80 the new tarmon version of 17-50mm f2.8 comes with lens motor so surely will AF one on the d60.


i knw cannot auto focus...but at that time i bought...i dun knw anything abt the lens...haiz...
 

It's always nice to have new toys.

hahaha...super agree with u.....feel happy once got a new toys evan maybe not really knw how to use....
 

I've got a 18-55mm and a 55-200mm; and in the last 4 months, the number of times I've found it necessary to change from one of these two lens to the other can be counted on one hand... maybe. :)

In all seriousness, I've found the 18-55mm to suit 90% of the (general) photography I do as an amateur. The only shoots I require longer reach of 200mm are also the times I don't need the 18-55mm at all.:)

thx....sometime i use my kit lens and wanna a more range...so consider to bring one lens cover my more range(sometime)...so it weill be cheaper after i sell my kit lens and fund a 18-135,,,haha...how do u think???thx
 

i tink you shud get the 55-250VR...having such a big difference in focal length for the 18-135 or 18-200 will affect the IQ as you probably already know...in the long run i'm sure you'll regret buying the 18-135 or 18-200...juz my opinion :)
 

Status
Not open for further replies.