I have a Canon 400D and am considering on getting the EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens. Can anyone give me advise on this lens? Also, any other lens that I should be considering?
Thanks!
Thanks!
I have a Canon 400D and am considering on getting the EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens. Can anyone give me advise on this lens? Also, any other lens that I should be considering?
Thanks!
Quite a good combo to start with. This lens is pretty sharp if you know how to use it. Good for landscapes and general photography, and with the IS, can achieve very good results.
I've got this lens before, but sold it after an upgrade after using it for about 5 years.
Any bad points about the lens?
Just out of curiousity, what lens did you get after selling this one?
In the film days, one could get by with this lens because most of the results are 3R or 4R prints. Digital is a different story. This lens holds up poorly when pictures are viewed at 100% on a computer. It just doesn't cut it anymore. Unless you're getting a copy at a very good price, suggest you give it a miss. There are a lot of options for zooms in the midrange. Shop around a bit more.I have a Canon 400D and am considering on getting the EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens. Can anyone give me advise on this lens? Also, any other lens that I should be considering?
Thanks!
In the film days, one could get by with this lens because most of the results are 3R or 4R prints. Digital is a different story. This lens holds up poorly when pictures are viewed at 100% on a computer. It just doesn't cut it anymore. Unless you're getting a copy at a very good price, suggest you give it a miss. There are a lot of options for zooms in the midrange. Shop around a bit more.
the 17-85 IS will serve you better... and the IS is far more advanced than this, though I still use the 28-135 on my film SLR.
This lens works better with a full frame camera since this is a EF-S lens, correct?
Can you explain why this is better as compared to the 28-135?
Thanks!
In the film days, one could get by with this lens because most of the results are 3R or 4R prints. Digital is a different story. This lens holds up poorly when pictures are viewed at 100% on a computer. It just doesn't cut it anymore. Unless you're getting a copy at a very good price, suggest you give it a miss. There are a lot of options for zooms in the midrange. Shop around a bit more.
Digital is a different story. This lens holds up poorly when pictures are viewed at 100% on a computer.
Don't quite agree with you. Not very sure what you mean by 'holds up poorly'. Do you mean sharpness? Colours? Or what? I include here a couple of examples which may prove you wrong. It was taken using the 28-135 with 10D many years back.
The 10D is 6mpix. The pics posted here are 800x533, or abt 400kb, viewed on my screen (and most other ppl's screens) it's about 4R. Which was my point, it looked ok/great around that size, after some decent PP.
i've personally put my 28-135IS through hundreds of rolls of film a year back in the film days, and i was happy with it too, then. i even thought my copy was faulty and bought a second one, but sold it off soon, coz i felt it just quite wasn't there. But hey, if you're happy with your copy, that's fine too; gives the TS two vantage points, someone happy with the lens and someone not too satisfied with it.
But the part about the wobbly front barrel (and zoom creep) is definitely true.
The 10D is 6mpix. The pics posted here are 800x533, or abt 400kb, viewed on my screen (and most other ppl's screens) it's about 4R. Which was my point, it looked ok/great around that size, after some decent PP.
i've personally put my 28-135IS through hundreds of rolls of film a year back in the film days, and i was happy with it too, then. i even thought my copy was faulty and bought a second one, but sold it off soon, coz i felt it just quite wasn't there. But hey, if you're happy with your copy, that's fine too; gives the TS two vantage points, someone happy with the lens and someone not too satisfied with it.
But the part about the wobbly front barrel (and zoom creep) is definitely true.