I've been disappointed with my 580 Ex flash. The reason is that it does not give me a consistent result as regards colour temperature. I find that that there is a variation of colours shooting in say, a 5 minute sequence at functions.
Now that the 580 Ex Mk.II is out, I have a chance to replace it. However I have been advised by shops and knowledgeable friends to get a Metz 58 flash instead of Canon. The main reason is that the Metz gives a very consistent colour temperature and is more reliable than Canons flashes (and even surpassing the Nikons' flashes as well). The other reason, but not a decisive one, is that the Metz flash is cheaper at about $600.
I know I should wait a while till the reviews of the new Canon flash is out but in general, would the comments about the Metz flashes be correct?
Would appreciate any comments you can give. Many thanks!
Now that the 580 Ex Mk.II is out, I have a chance to replace it. However I have been advised by shops and knowledgeable friends to get a Metz 58 flash instead of Canon. The main reason is that the Metz gives a very consistent colour temperature and is more reliable than Canons flashes (and even surpassing the Nikons' flashes as well). The other reason, but not a decisive one, is that the Metz flash is cheaper at about $600.
I know I should wait a while till the reviews of the new Canon flash is out but in general, would the comments about the Metz flashes be correct?
Would appreciate any comments you can give. Many thanks!