, or (2) suggest poor interpretational ability. Just state the link would do, and let readers interpret it themselves, or seek legal advice.
link? one more click? why?
huh? moi seek legal advice? u had a bad day? have u been following the thread.
no doubt following it may require some interpretational ability.
just trying to help out TS lah, moi no need for legal advice on this matter.
are you with us?
huh?? poor attempt to bash and then this??
hypocritical.
Good on you for seeing the contradiction. In a western countries such as Australia, it's made very clear that 18 is the age of adulthood, and this is the age applied to modeling (clothed or nude).
where is the contradiction? difference ages for different matters? seems reasonable.
TS question is specific to age for modelling.
why must there be a universal age for "adulthood" to which all matters apply?
In Singapore, you could suspect that people are conveniently and quite blindly following laws set by other countries. Maybe, they have to because the ministers haven't sat down to decide it and pass it in the bill.
are you a lawyer specialising in countries' laws?
is adaptation of other countries law practised by SG only?
one would think this is the most prudent way of doing it.
there is nothing like something already put into practise.
any substantiation or speculative Spore (minister) bashing again?
If anything, I would say, like what many guys would say, do anything but just don't get caught. Still, one day, somebody will surely screw-up and get caught, and new laws will be made.
by screwing up u mean breaking the law?
jeez..