N night86mare Deregistered Aug 25, 2006 25,474 3 38 www.pbase.com Feb 28, 2007 #2 Not for me. No offense meant, but first impression was.. VGA camera photo converted to B&W.
A antacid Senior Member Sep 25, 2005 1,512 0 36 New York, Singapore www.colouredshots.com Feb 28, 2007 #3 maybe if it wasnt so grainy, and the bloom is a little more controlled. try it in Photoshop?
B BurgaFlippinMan New Member Jun 20, 2004 636 0 0 Feb 28, 2007 #4 Thks for the feedback. I actually kinda like the grain personally, tho I do feel that composition is slightly dodgy. Burga - who does find the lo-fi look somewhat appealing at times.
Thks for the feedback. I actually kinda like the grain personally, tho I do feel that composition is slightly dodgy. Burga - who does find the lo-fi look somewhat appealing at times.
S Steplim New Member May 11, 2005 297 0 0 58 One North Feb 28, 2007 #5 I hope you don't mind that I have pp. see below. But, looks like it still too grainy.
B BurgaFlippinMan New Member Jun 20, 2004 636 0 0 Feb 28, 2007 #7 Steplim said: I hope you don't mind that I have pp. see below. But, looks like it still too grainy. Click to expand... I dont mind. Grain is fine by me. espion said: and the intention being? Click to expand... Experimenting with the soft dreamy half abstract look.
Steplim said: I hope you don't mind that I have pp. see below. But, looks like it still too grainy. Click to expand... I dont mind. Grain is fine by me. espion said: and the intention being? Click to expand... Experimenting with the soft dreamy half abstract look.
ortega Moderator Nov 2, 2004 23,752 16 38 Singapore, Singapore, Singapor Feb 28, 2007 #8 does not work for me just too "not here, not there"
P pokiemon Senior Member Mar 5, 2005 2,035 0 0 Feb 28, 2007 #9 doesn't work. too flat. can't even see what's what. are they naked women water skiing?
B BurgaFlippinMan New Member Jun 20, 2004 636 0 0 Feb 28, 2007 #10 okies. thks for the feedback. appreciate your views.
iboey New Member Jun 16, 2006 1,202 0 0 Eastern Singapore www.iboey.com Mar 1, 2007 #11 The glare is too much for the eyes...making viewers uncomfortable...