Does higher ISO give you clearer pictures than lower ISO pictures or do they just give you the option to take photos at a quicker speed and reduce the quality of the photo. Please explain? Thanks
For Example, you take a picture in a room using the same aperture and shutter settings, but one picture you use an ISO rating of 100 and the other you use an ISO rating of 1600, the 1600 will turn out brighter compared to the other picture.
So Higer ISO gives you higher shutter speeds to avoid taking blur pictures for example in the dark am i right? But in exchange for noise. So lower ISO doesn't mean better quality pictures. One more question, does 400 ISO good for taking photos on film or is 200 better or do you decide which one according to the lighting conditions. Thanks for explaining
So I dont think i will be changing flims just for the sake of the iso :sweat: . Thanks for the reply. By the way, why does the shop sell the high ISO films more expensive than the low ISO flims?
Yeah maybe. Even if I do change films, I would hardly change it to a higher ISO most likely a lower ISO flim. 200 seems very well balanced between 100 and 400. Unless its a 1. Important event 2. I have a tripod. By the way how do you tell to camera to wind to the spot where you left off? If some "error" occurs will the pictures be destoryed? Thanks again
I believe you can't 'resume' a roll of film. You have to
1. finish shooting it.
2. rewind at the point where you want to stop, and not reuse it anymore.
I may be wrong(?)
I believe you can't 'resume' a roll of film. You have to
1. finish shooting it.
2. rewind at the point where you want to stop, and not reuse it anymore.
I may be wrong(?)
I believe you can't 'resume' a roll of film. You have to
1. finish shooting it.
2. rewind at the point where you want to stop, and not reuse it anymore.
I may be wrong(?)
waa sweeeee... i got 1600 stabiliser on my camISO = Image Stabilizer On?