its been done to death.
there're old threads on this.
oh great.save me the trouble then.thanks!
cheese, share the link.cant find
its been done to death.
there're old threads on this.
no offense but to me this is not the 'correct' kind of lighting.
look at their faces.very deep shadows.
imo, shot too near with bounce?
Shoot less than 1m away with no bounce card no LS nothing... in very dark condition..
The shadow also something which i dun want..
KH
Shoot less than 1m away with no bounce card no LS nothing... in very dark condition..
The shadow also something which i dun want..
KH
for metz, my 45 cl(?)(cant rem exact model) has 2 flashes.
one big hammerhead for you to point upwards for bounce, another small one for fill flash to cover shadows in pretty faces.
i definitely believe my metz model has been discontinued and they def have better ones.
I guessed you sacrificed the highlight details to get the backgorund properly exposed?
I guessed you sacrificed the highlight details to get the backgorund properly exposed?
To me every shot has to count n not waste my time being there at all right?
Been using the bounce card technique for about 2 decades now.
High ceilings never detered me.
Shot at 1st WTO meet in Singapore about a decade ago n got the shots
I wanted while others were lamenting about how bouncing cannot work
on high ceiling n such. The proof is in the pudding, its never about
the equipment you have but how u use them to your advantage
like everything else.
If u are using Canon's system, it is not an issue as ISO can be adjusted very high. Wait until u use my D70s under high ceiling and yellow light conditions. Can cry. If u can put your hands on a Metz with a Canon:thumbsup: , even better.
sacrificing foreground details for backround exposure.i notice most event pics are like that.
anyway, to the organisers, they dont really see the pics from a photography viewpoint right?as long as agaragar correctly exposed, alot of heads in the shots, background brightness acceptable can liao rite?
Hi Jeanie,
When someone pays you to shoot, most times they would expect you
to produce results which they want to see n not the other way around..
clients always appreciate ambience in the photos..
correct flash exposures are also very important..
I understand wat you mean, hahaha...
Btw, which Metz Model were you refering to?? The 60CT series?
I used to use them for all my shoots.. nowadays it has become
too heavy for me, hehe.. I still have them..
That is why for such scenarios as high ceilings, I will turn to my 30D.
Your 60 CT sure solid.
mine is this one.
45 CL-4.
the problem with the secondary fill reflector is that the output ratio between the main and the secondary is fixed. when used together with the main reflector pointed up at the ceiling, and if the distance-to-subject is much closer than the distance-to-ceiling, most of the subject's illumination comes from the secondary instead of the bounce - not very much different from straight-on flash.
bounce card is still more effective in most circumstances compared to using the secondary. at least, that usually holds true for my 54-series.