Welcome to the ClubSNAP Photography Forums.
27Likes
-
29th July 2012, 01:40 AM
#21
Re: Kodak Tri-X development

Originally Posted by
weihsuan
Sample shot: TriX, 400iso, HC110, 29'C, Dilution E: 5.5mins

Red filter?
-
29th July 2012, 01:42 AM
#22
Re: Kodak Tri-X development



Sample shots of development with HC-110 A, 5:25mins for shots @800. No post processing
-
30th July 2012, 08:51 AM
#23
Re: Kodak Tri-X development

Originally Posted by
Riotbmx
Red filter?
It was a yellow filter on a Super Angulon 21mm F4. Not sure why it came out this way, perhaps the intense blue sky helped.
-
2nd August 2012, 08:28 PM
#24
Re: Kodak Tri-X development
Robertson Quay Noir in Six Minus One Pictures
Kodak Tri-X with Leica IIIf and Summicron 50





raytoei
six minus one because i omitted one image to fit into one post
-
2nd August 2012, 11:30 PM
#25
I shot a roll just now, realised I accidentally switch from A mode to 1000th of a sec when reloading. Totally pissed with myself for making such mistakes. Think I'll develop it at 3200 or maybe 6400 to see if any photos will show up. Got some hookers at Orchard towers and chicks at the Martell party in it
-
2nd August 2012, 11:49 PM
#26
Re: Kodak Tri-X development
hoot... i think hookers + after party chics look good in iso3200 high contrast...i can't wait... much more interesting than taking pictures of signboards at robertson quay....
-
3rd August 2012, 12:58 AM
#27

Originally Posted by
raytoei
hoot... i think hookers + after party chics look good in iso3200 high contrast...i can't wait... much more interesting than taking pictures of signboards at robertson quay....
I can't wait too... literally... 2hrs of developing time
-
3rd August 2012, 04:28 AM
#28
So developing it at HC-110 1:100 for 2hrs couldn't save it as much of the roll was very very underexposed. I proceeded to develop another roll shot correctly @1600, ended up with uneven development again. I'm always having trouble feeding Tri-X into the Paterson reel, haven't had problems with other film. Anyone encounter this as well?
-
3rd August 2012, 10:14 AM
#29
Re: Kodak Tri-X development

Originally Posted by
Riotbmx
So developing it at HC-110 1:100 for 2hrs couldn't save it as much of the roll was very very underexposed. I proceeded to develop another roll shot correctly @1600, ended up with uneven development again. I'm always having trouble feeding Tri-X into the Paterson reel, haven't had problems with other film. Anyone encounter this as well?
cos Tri-X tends to curl up more easily?
-
3rd August 2012, 10:30 AM
#30
Re: Kodak Tri-X development
young man, you need to slow down...
your excitment over taking pix of girls has
caused your hands to sweat and thus unable
to insert your film into the reel slot.
LOL just kidding...
-
3rd August 2012, 11:15 PM
#31
Re: Kodak Tri-X development
I thought I wasn't gonna get any photos, but I tried to recover as much as I can pushing to 3200. Raytoei will prolly like this
-
4th August 2012, 06:17 AM
#32
Re: Kodak Tri-X development
-
4th August 2012, 07:51 AM
#33
Re: Kodak Tri-X development
I shot this at 1600 and EV -1. Still not ready to go to 3200 haha. (Not sure if there's a difference in diafine though)

I thought the grains were still manageable as opposed to another film I just tried, ultrafine extreme 400.
-
4th August 2012, 08:37 AM
#34
Re: Kodak Tri-X development

sorry this has nothing to do with tri-x.... i just got caught up with noir and restaurant...
this was taken yesterday, 50 cron digital
Last edited by raytoei; 4th August 2012 at 08:44 AM.
-
4th August 2012, 06:37 PM
#35
This is shot @1600, HC-110 B.

I think Ilford HP5 push to 1600 much better than Tri-X in HC-110. I heard DD-X is good for pushing Tri-X.
I got 200ft of Ultrafine Extreme 400 yet to shot, need to get the hang of getting proper results with Tri-X first
-
4th August 2012, 06:42 PM
#36
Re: Kodak Tri-X development
eh maybe better to pair the developer from the same company ?
eg..
Kodak Tri-X + Kodak XTOL (push developer)
Ilford HP5+ + Ilford DDX (push developer)
Last edited by raytoei; 4th August 2012 at 06:51 PM.
-
4th August 2012, 11:19 PM
#37
yoz guys! if u push the iso, need push developer?
-
4th August 2012, 11:31 PM
#38
Re: Kodak Tri-X development
yes. if you use tri-x at iso 1600, then the development time for tri-x at 1600 will be different,
hence "Push Processing"
if you go to massive chart for tri-x, under hc 110 for 1600, you have to develope at 16mins for dilution B etc...
Tri-X 400 HC-110 B 1600 16 16 20C [notes]
Tri-X 400 HC-110 F-G 1600 40 20C [notes]
Tri-X 400 HC-110 F-G (1+100) 1600 50 20C
-
5th August 2012, 03:41 PM
#39
Re: Kodak Tri-X development
sinned: can think of it as shutter speed and aperture. ISO and development also has a reciprocal relationship.
Unless you use a compensating developer like diafine or acufine, that should be the case.
-
5th August 2012, 03:50 PM
#40
Re: Kodak Tri-X development

Originally Posted by
raytoei
yes. if you use tri-x at iso 1600, then the development time for tri-x at 1600 will be different,
hence "Push Processing"
if you go to massive chart for tri-x, under hc 110 for 1600, you have to develope at 16mins for dilution B etc...
Tri-X 400 HC-110 B 1600 16 16 20C [notes]
Tri-X 400 HC-110 F-G 1600 40 20C [notes]
Tri-X 400 HC-110 F-G (1+100) 1600 50 20C

Originally Posted by
zgim80
sinned: can think of it as shutter speed and aperture. ISO and development also has a reciprocal relationship.
Unless you use a compensating developer like diafine or acufine, that should be the case.
thanks! besides the developing time... i also need a push developer... what happens if i just using HC100 B dilution and develop for 16 mins without the push developer?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Powered by
vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:31 PM.
Bookmarks