Welcome to the ClubSNAP Photography Forums.
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 69
Like Tree27Likes

Thread: Kodak Tri-X development

  1. #21
    Riotbmx's Avatar
    Riotbmx is online now Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chinapore
    Posts
    820

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development

    Quote Originally Posted by weihsuan View Post
    Sample shot: TriX, 400iso, HC110, 29'C, Dilution E: 5.5mins
    Red filter?
    http://5iftysf.tumblr.com/
    I'm responsible for what I write, not what you interpret

  2. #22
    Riotbmx's Avatar
    Riotbmx is online now Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chinapore
    Posts
    820

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development







    Sample shots of development with HC-110 A, 5:25mins for shots @800. No post processing
    raytoei likes this.
    http://5iftysf.tumblr.com/
    I'm responsible for what I write, not what you interpret

  3. #23
    weihsuan's Avatar
    weihsuan is online now Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,091

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development

    Quote Originally Posted by Riotbmx View Post
    Red filter?
    It was a yellow filter on a Super Angulon 21mm F4. Not sure why it came out this way, perhaps the intense blue sky helped.

  4. #24
    raytoei is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,002

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development

    Robertson Quay Noir in Six Minus One Pictures
    Kodak Tri-X with Leica IIIf and Summicron 50











    raytoei
    six minus one because i omitted one image to fit into one post
    MagnumLite likes this.

  5. #25
    Riotbmx's Avatar
    Riotbmx is online now Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chinapore
    Posts
    820

    Default

    I shot a roll just now, realised I accidentally switch from A mode to 1000th of a sec when reloading. Totally pissed with myself for making such mistakes. Think I'll develop it at 3200 or maybe 6400 to see if any photos will show up. Got some hookers at Orchard towers and chicks at the Martell party in it
    http://5iftysf.tumblr.com/
    I'm responsible for what I write, not what you interpret

  6. #26
    raytoei is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,002

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development

    hoot... i think hookers + after party chics look good in iso3200 high contrast...i can't wait... much more interesting than taking pictures of signboards at robertson quay....

  7. #27
    Riotbmx's Avatar
    Riotbmx is online now Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chinapore
    Posts
    820

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by raytoei
    hoot... i think hookers + after party chics look good in iso3200 high contrast...i can't wait... much more interesting than taking pictures of signboards at robertson quay....
    I can't wait too... literally... 2hrs of developing time
    http://5iftysf.tumblr.com/
    I'm responsible for what I write, not what you interpret

  8. #28
    Riotbmx's Avatar
    Riotbmx is online now Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chinapore
    Posts
    820

    Default

    So developing it at HC-110 1:100 for 2hrs couldn't save it as much of the roll was very very underexposed. I proceeded to develop another roll shot correctly @1600, ended up with uneven development again. I'm always having trouble feeding Tri-X into the Paterson reel, haven't had problems with other film. Anyone encounter this as well?
    http://5iftysf.tumblr.com/
    I'm responsible for what I write, not what you interpret

  9. #29
    sinned79's Avatar
    sinned79 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    10,023

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development

    Quote Originally Posted by Riotbmx View Post
    So developing it at HC-110 1:100 for 2hrs couldn't save it as much of the roll was very very underexposed. I proceeded to develop another roll shot correctly @1600, ended up with uneven development again. I'm always having trouble feeding Tri-X into the Paterson reel, haven't had problems with other film. Anyone encounter this as well?
    cos Tri-X tends to curl up more easily?

  10. #30
    raytoei is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,002

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development

    young man, you need to slow down...
    your excitment over taking pix of girls has
    caused your hands to sweat and thus unable
    to insert your film into the reel slot.

    LOL just kidding...

  11. #31
    Riotbmx's Avatar
    Riotbmx is online now Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chinapore
    Posts
    820

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development

    I thought I wasn't gonna get any photos, but I tried to recover as much as I can pushing to 3200. Raytoei will prolly like this

    EiRiK, sinned79, raytoei and 1 others like this.
    http://5iftysf.tumblr.com/
    I'm responsible for what I write, not what you interpret

  12. #32
    raytoei is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,002

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development

    super noir...i like!

  13. #33
    zgim80 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    North East
    Posts
    257

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development

    I shot this at 1600 and EV -1. Still not ready to go to 3200 haha. (Not sure if there's a difference in diafine though)



    I thought the grains were still manageable as opposed to another film I just tried, ultrafine extreme 400.
    raytoei likes this.

  14. #34
    raytoei is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,002

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development



    sorry this has nothing to do with tri-x.... i just got caught up with noir and restaurant...

    this was taken yesterday, 50 cron digital
    Last edited by raytoei; 4th August 2012 at 08:44 AM.

  15. #35
    Riotbmx's Avatar
    Riotbmx is online now Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chinapore
    Posts
    820

    Default

    This is shot @1600, HC-110 B.



    I think Ilford HP5 push to 1600 much better than Tri-X in HC-110. I heard DD-X is good for pushing Tri-X.

    I got 200ft of Ultrafine Extreme 400 yet to shot, need to get the hang of getting proper results with Tri-X first
    raytoei likes this.
    http://5iftysf.tumblr.com/
    I'm responsible for what I write, not what you interpret

  16. #36
    raytoei is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,002

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development

    eh maybe better to pair the developer from the same company ?

    eg..

    Kodak Tri-X + Kodak XTOL (push developer)

    Ilford HP5+ + Ilford DDX (push developer)

    Last edited by raytoei; 4th August 2012 at 06:51 PM.

  17. #37
    sinned79's Avatar
    sinned79 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    10,023

    Default

    yoz guys! if u push the iso, need push developer?

  18. #38
    raytoei is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,002

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development

    yes. if you use tri-x at iso 1600, then the development time for tri-x at 1600 will be different,
    hence "Push Processing"

    if you go to massive chart for tri-x, under hc 110 for 1600, you have to develope at 16mins for dilution B etc...

    Tri-X 400 HC-110 B 1600 16 16 20C [notes]
    Tri-X 400 HC-110 F-G 1600 40 20C [notes]
    Tri-X 400 HC-110 F-G (1+100) 1600 50 20C

  19. #39
    zgim80 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    North East
    Posts
    257

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development

    sinned: can think of it as shutter speed and aperture. ISO and development also has a reciprocal relationship.

    Unless you use a compensating developer like diafine or acufine, that should be the case.

  20. #40
    sinned79's Avatar
    sinned79 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    10,023

    Default Re: Kodak Tri-X development

    Quote Originally Posted by raytoei View Post
    yes. if you use tri-x at iso 1600, then the development time for tri-x at 1600 will be different,
    hence "Push Processing"

    if you go to massive chart for tri-x, under hc 110 for 1600, you have to develope at 16mins for dilution B etc...

    Tri-X 400 HC-110 B 1600 16 16 20C [notes]
    Tri-X 400 HC-110 F-G 1600 40 20C [notes]
    Tri-X 400 HC-110 F-G (1+100) 1600 50 20C

    Quote Originally Posted by zgim80 View Post
    sinned: can think of it as shutter speed and aperture. ISO and development also has a reciprocal relationship.

    Unless you use a compensating developer like diafine or acufine, that should be the case.
    thanks! besides the developing time... i also need a push developer... what happens if i just using HC100 B dilution and develop for 16 mins without the push developer?

 

 
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top