Welcome to the ClubSNAP Photography Forums.
Page 21 of 39 FirstFirst ... 11 16 19 20 21 22 23 26 31 ... LastLast
Results 401 to 420 of 763
  1. #401
    jt3000sg2 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    92

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    hmmm. anybody can suggest where is the best place (best value for money, good service, sharp copies) to get this lense? i might be getting it very soon after results are out.

  2. #402
    lsl03 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Western Singapore
    Posts
    428

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Quote Originally Posted by jt3000sg2 View Post
    hmmm. anybody can suggest where is the best place (best value for money, good service, sharp copies) to get this lense? i might be getting it very soon after results are out.
    good service from mscolor, john3:16, cathay photo marina.
    Best vaule for money from k13 and alan photo
    sharp copies depends on your luck

  3. #403
    oTaRu's Avatar
    oTaRu is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,261

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    hey guys, i now struggling over 17-50 f2.8 and canon 17-40 f4... i dunno which one will be my choice... hope someone enlighten me...

    and i also have some doubt on tarmon lens...
    how many yrs of warranty from tarmon?
    will the glass coating wear off after certain usage?

    Thanks!

  4. #404
    metallilan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    2,869

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Quote Originally Posted by oTaRu View Post
    hey guys, i now struggling over 17-50 f2.8 and canon 17-40 f4... i dunno which one will be my choice... hope someone enlighten me...

    and i also have some doubt on tarmon lens...
    how many yrs of warranty from tarmon?
    will the glass coating wear off after certain usage?

    Thanks!
    I think the warranty is 3 years.1 + 2 years extended through Tithes marketing.

    What do you mean by glass coating wearing off?

    A pic i took some time back to test the bokeh & sharpness..

    Last edited by metallilan; 27th February 2007 at 01:15 PM.

  5. #405
    solomon76 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    629

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    HI the lens is good stuff
    if you are interested can check out some shots at
    http://picasaweb.google.com/solomonc...amron1750mmF28

    I got mine at alan photo ( funan)

  6. #406
    oTaRu's Avatar
    oTaRu is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,261

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Quote Originally Posted by metallilan View Post
    I think the warranty is 3 years.1 + 2 years extended through Tithes marketing.

    What do you mean by glass coating wearing off?

    A pic i took some time back to test the bokeh & sharpness..

    ic... 3 yrs warranty...
    hmm... isnt the lens coating will wear off after certain usages? correct me if i'm wrong... still new to dslr...

    thanks for answering my question!
    Last edited by oTaRu; 27th February 2007 at 02:10 PM.

  7. #407
    foreverlovex is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    848

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Quote Originally Posted by oTaRu View Post
    ic... 3 yrs warranty...
    hmm... isnt the lens coating will wear off after certain usages? correct me if i'm wrong... still new to dslr...

    thanks for answering my question!
    I think u referring to Sigma lens.

  8. #408
    Scaglietti is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,543

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Quote Originally Posted by oTaRu View Post
    ic... 3 yrs warranty...
    hmm... isnt the lens coating will wear off after certain usages? correct me if i'm wrong... still new to dslr...

    thanks for answering my question!
    Why will coating wear off? Not unless you are scrubbing it...

    BC

  9. #409
    oTaRu's Avatar
    oTaRu is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,261

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Quote Originally Posted by foreverlovex View Post
    I think u referring to Sigma lens.
    ya... i referring to 3rd party lens...
    my mistakes for not mentioning clearly earlier...

  10. #410
    oTaRu's Avatar
    oTaRu is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,261

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Quote Originally Posted by Scaglietti View Post
    Why will coating wear off? Not unless you are scrubbing it...

    BC
    i also dont know leh... i heard from some photographers...

  11. #411
    lsl03 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Western Singapore
    Posts
    428

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Quote Originally Posted by oTaRu View Post
    hey guys, i now struggling over 17-50 f2.8 and canon 17-40 f4... i dunno which one will be my choice... hope someone enlighten me...

    and i also have some doubt on tarmon lens...
    how many yrs of warranty from tarmon?
    will the glass coating wear off after certain usage?

    Thanks!
    Upgrade to full frame in future ? = 17-40 f4
    Silent/faster and better build ? = 17-40 f4

    Often shooting in low light? = 17-50 f2.8
    Need a longer zoom range? = 17-50 f2.8
    Value conscious ? = 17-50 f2.8

  12. #412
    oTaRu's Avatar
    oTaRu is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,261

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Quote Originally Posted by lsl03 View Post
    Upgrade to full frame in future ? = 17-40 f4
    Silent/faster and better build ? = 17-40 f4

    Often shooting in low light? = 17-50 f2.8
    Need a longer zoom range? = 17-50 f2.8
    Value conscious ? = 17-50 f2.8
    i wan a 17-40's slient and better build but require a longer zoom range... not oftenly shooting in low light... but no budget... can only choose either 17-40 or 17-50...
    wat a troublesome guy am i...

  13. #413
    metallilan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    2,869

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Quote Originally Posted by oTaRu View Post
    i wan a 17-40's slient and better build but require a longer zoom range... not oftenly shooting in low light... but no budget... can only choose either 17-40 or 17-50...
    wat a troublesome guy am i...
    If you will using the lens for occasional potraits..the f/2.8 might come in handy..

  14. #414
    oTaRu's Avatar
    oTaRu is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,261

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Quote Originally Posted by metallilan View Post
    If you will using the lens for occasional potraits..the f/2.8 might come in handy..
    hmmm... i will take note of this... thanks~!

  15. #415
    calebk is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Clementi
    Posts
    10,607

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Used both before.

    The L handles nicer, feels more solid, is great to take around, doesn't extend during focusing or zooming, and focuses quietly and quickly.

    The Tamron is value for money, performs quite decently, allows one more stop of light than the L, feels a little too plasticy for my liking, handling isn't as good as the L (but that's just me), focuses really near, and quite fast also.

  16. #416
    solomon76 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    629

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    HI the F2.8 really comes in handy for low light shots, esp in enclosed environment like a room even in day time.

  17. #417
    isomers007 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    leepublic of singapore
    Posts
    1,765

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    hi,

    can it go pretty close? thx.

  18. #418
    ExplorerZ is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Legion
    Posts
    7,460

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Quote Originally Posted by lsl03 View Post
    Upgrade to full frame in future ? = 17-40 f4
    Silent/faster and better build ? = 17-40 f4

    Often shooting in low light? = 17-50 f2.8
    Need a longer zoom range? = 17-50 f2.8
    Value conscious ? = 17-50 f2.8
    lsl03 have basically listed out the important factor...

    as for performance, tamron is up to the L, some even said its sharper. contrast wise, normally the L would have an slight edge tho.

  19. #419
    isomers007 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    leepublic of singapore
    Posts
    1,765

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Quote Originally Posted by calebk View Post
    Used both before.

    The L handles nicer, feels more solid, is great to take around, doesn't extend during focusing or zooming, and focuses quietly and quickly.

    The Tamron is value for money, performs quite decently, allows one more stop of light than the L, feels a little too plasticy for my liking, handling isn't as good as the L (but that's just me), focuses really near, and quite fast also.
    oops...know the answer to my question already. thx.

  20. #420
    calebk is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Clementi
    Posts
    10,607

    Default Re: Tamrom 17-50 f2.8

    Quote Originally Posted by isomers007 View Post
    hi,

    can it go pretty close? thx.
    Yes. Check out the stats on the Tamron page if you will. MFD (minimum focusing distance) is 0.27m.

 

 
Page 21 of 39 FirstFirst ... 11 16 19 20 21 22 23 26 31 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top