Welcome to the ClubSNAP Photography Forums.
-
24th February 2012, 02:07 PM
#21
It is sad that there is no shop that offers this lens for rental
I am thinking of getting this but will prefer some serious testing before buying, to see if it suits me
-
24th February 2012, 03:36 PM
#22
Re: Tammy/sigma 70-200

Originally Posted by
zurichdo
It is sad that there is no shop that offers this lens for rental
I am thinking of getting this but will prefer some serious testing before buying, to see if it suits me
well if you want I can let you try mine? not the os version though =D
-
24th February 2012, 07:15 PM
#23

Originally Posted by
luckyorange
well if you want I can let you try mine? not the os version though =D
Ehhh I oso wan. Maybe we can go shooting sometime tgt haha
There are no bad photographers, only photos that could've been done better
My Flickr
-
24th February 2012, 08:09 PM
#24

Originally Posted by
Fudgecakes
Ehhh I oso wan. Maybe we can go shooting sometime tgt haha
No problem Haha.
-
24th February 2012, 11:10 PM
#25

Originally Posted by
luckyorange
well if you want I can let you try mine? not the os version though =D
I canon user leh....
-
24th February 2012, 11:25 PM
#26

Originally Posted by
zurichdo
I canon user leh....

Wah then u Sian already. Haha. I think some shops allow you to try out de lenses de
There are no bad photographers, only photos that could've been done better
My Flickr
-
25th February 2012, 02:05 AM
#27
Re: Tammy/sigma 70-200
There are many reviews out there on this already. Sigma OS's performance is quite impressive. Some say the performance is very similar to that of the Nikon 70-200VR version 1. I was contemplating whether to get the Sigma OS (back then it was priced at 1.4k) but in the end went for the Nikon VR2.
One thing to note though, is that the rings on the Sigma OS is reversed. The zoom ring is nearer to the lens hood, and the focus ring is closer to the camera mount. So when your hood is in the reversed position, it is very difficult (almost impossible) to turn the zoom ring. Another is resale value is lower, and is harder to sell compared to the Nikon VR1, or the VR2.
Good Luck and have fun.
-
25th February 2012, 06:37 AM
#28
What made you go for the one that cost twice as much?
There are no bad photographers, only photos that could've been done better
My Flickr
-
25th February 2012, 08:52 AM
#29
Nikon lens is a class of its own. Rent a copy and try and you will know the differences
-
25th February 2012, 09:04 AM
#30
Re: Tammy/sigma 70-200
I'm this lens on every shoot, esp events. LOVE it!
- My main worry was low light performance as compared to Nikon as I often shoot in hotels room during conferences.etc
However this proved to be unfounded. It never has any problems locking focus and focuses fast. The OS works very well, and I most often has it set to setting1 as it allows me to shoot at lower ISO.
- No front/back focus issue on my D700. Sharp even at long end which I v often use.
- With regards to the reversing of focusing ring. Firstly, not many is gonna use it with it huge lens hood reversed. Google online for its pics..its a monster and almost looks like you can stab someone..lol I do not use it on my shoots. Also I remove tripod collar.
- Secondly I've found that it works great with the zoom closer to the hood as I'm able to adjust zoom using my index finger tips, pointing frontwards.
Other fingers still firmly on lens, minimal movement.
Hope it helps. Glad I did not purchase the Nikon as I can cannot fault this lens. I believe its also lighter than Nikon, which of course is v helpful.
Cons: Of course, I do agree it'll have lower resale value, not sure abt servicing, etc.
*Has not posted any photos online using this lens yet. Well Nikon mount here too.
With tripod collar easily removed, I slide into the thinktank pouch when not in use.
Last edited by redmonsoon; 25th February 2012 at 10:39 AM.
-
25th February 2012, 09:11 AM
#31

Originally Posted by
zurichdo
I canon user leh....

Haha,.wasted m using nikon
-
2nd March 2012, 06:19 PM
#32
Re: Tammy/sigma 70-200
Can someone post some pictures in this thread?
Love to see some from our own local people. Tired of seeing POTN ones already
-
6th March 2012, 07:46 AM
#33
Re: Tammy/sigma 70-200

Originally Posted by
Fudgecakes
What made you go for the one that cost twice as much?
The picture quality (sharpness, a lot less vignette), the 4 stop VR (tested to be 3.7 stops, sigma tested to 3 stops), the speed in focusing...
plus I got it at a really good deal.
Very hard to beat the 70-200VR. only thing is, yes, you are right that it is a lot more expensive. But in the time since I owned it, it has already paid for itself.
-
6th March 2012, 06:53 PM
#34

Originally Posted by
daredevil123
The picture quality (sharpness, a lot less vignette), the 4 stop VR (tested to be 3.7 stops, sigma tested to 3 stops), the speed in focusing...
plus I got it at a really good deal.
Very hard to beat the 70-200VR. only thing is, yes, you are right that it is a lot more expensive. But in the time since I owned it, it has already paid for itself.
Cool cool. I bought mine already. Non OS version though. I'm using crop body so vingette shuld not be a problem. Focusing is fastest of all my lenses. And I'm not earning from it so probably my purchase is more justifiable for me. Haha
There are no bad photographers, only photos that could've been done better
My Flickr
-
6th March 2012, 06:53 PM
#35

Originally Posted by
austinheight
Can someone post some pictures in this thread?

Love to see some from our own local people. Tired of seeing POTN ones already

Sure. After I've shot abit more with it :P
There are no bad photographers, only photos that could've been done better
My Flickr
-
6th March 2012, 08:50 PM
#36

Originally Posted by
Fudgecakes
Sure. After I've shot abit more with it :P
Thanks bro, hope to see your pictures soon
-
6th March 2012, 10:25 PM
#37

Originally Posted by
Fudgecakes
Cool cool. I bought mine already. Non OS version though. I'm using crop body so vingette shuld not be a problem. Focusing is fastest of all my lenses. And I'm not earning from it so probably my purchase is more justifiable for me. Haha
Grats on your purchase, btw how much you pay for it? Mind saying? If not pm also can
-
6th March 2012, 10:55 PM
#38

Originally Posted by
luckyorange
Grats on your purchase, btw how much you pay for it? Mind saying? If not pm also can
Erm 850. Mint condition
There are no bad photographers, only photos that could've been done better
My Flickr
-
6th March 2012, 10:59 PM
#39

Originally Posted by
Fudgecakes
Erm 850. Mint condition
Bro have u tried the lens in low light? How was the hand-hold ability at 200mm?
-
6th March 2012, 11:00 PM
#40

Originally Posted by
austinheight
Thanks bro, hope to see your pictures soon

Eh bro how about you look out for my gallery in streets and candids. Since I bought my lens already I think I should close this thread. My gallery is called "with a d5k in my hand and a backpack on my back, I walk on" it's in streets and candids
There are no bad photographers, only photos that could've been done better
My Flickr
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Powered by
vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 07:17 PM.
Bookmarks