Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Different HDR processes : Which one works best for you ?

  1. #1

    Default Different HDR processes : Which one works best for you ?

    HI everyone,

    I would like to share some information about HDR pressing. What technique are you using ?

    I use several different processes so far , still can not decide which is the best ( depends on the situation)
    1) Shot several pictures in Raw or Jpeg with + / - stops and stack them with HDR stacking software ( NIK or Photoshop 5)
    2) Shot one Raw picture, process to at least 3 different Jpegs ( sky , mid tones, shadows) and stack them as in point one
    3) Use ether method 1 or 2 to shot, and stack pictures manually ( masking / graduation )
    4) Use selective brightness, contrast, saturation setting on one picture

  2. #2
    Member Kenneth67C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Shanghai, China, China
    Posts
    1,087

    Default Re: Different HDR processes : Which one works best for you ?

    Firstly let me state that I use Photomatix pro.
    I usually shoot 3 shots +/- 1-2 stops depending on the scene, always in RAW.
    RAW offers more detail plus even in the worst situation that you cannot use 2 of the 3 shots, then you might be able to save the shot with just that 1 good shot to do the HDR. Photomatix allows you to just load the single shot and it will extrapolate the exposure, you don't need to manually do it outside of the software, although that is possible.

    On a side note, I generally avoid using the presets, which make the shot look exaggerated.

    I'll let the others who use the same software as you to comment further.
    An artist who realizes there is a supreme force and works gladly as an apprentice under heaven.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Different HDR processes : Which one works best for you ?

    Thanks for your comments Kennneth, I also shoot everything in raw, it is better to convert later, as jpeg is not a lossless compression.
    I tried out Phomatix , it is very common , I heard. But, as I am working on a Mac, NIK HDR Effex Pro is the choice, or the new HDR functionality of Photoshop CS5 . These 2 work great for 80% of my pictures, but sometimes I do 100 % handwork, with different raw ( if available ) or from raw created jpegs , and masking / graduatuation / overlaying technique .of course this takes ages.

  4. #4
    Member Kenneth67C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Shanghai, China, China
    Posts
    1,087

    Default Re: Different HDR processes : Which one works best for you ?

    I'm using a Mac too. Photomatix is available for Mac OS.
    An artist who realizes there is a supreme force and works gladly as an apprentice under heaven.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Different HDR processes : Which one works best for you ?

    Mind sharing the masking/graduation/overlaying techniques?
    Canon EOS 500D | 18-55mm IS | 100-300mm f5.6 | Benro m-058 + KB-0 | Phottix BP-450D | Nissin Di866

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    605

    Default Re: Different HDR processes : Which one works best for you ?

    For me the usual HDR workflow would be:

    1. Shoot in RAW at 0, +2EV, -2EV (most of the time 3 shots are sufficient; can expand to +/-3EV and/or 5 shots, but it all depends on how wide ranging the range is)
    2. Merge shots on Photomatix and tweak controls until "shiok". I also avoided the presets because of the cartoony effects, and secondly, I want to create my own desired look.
    3. Save merged shot as TIF file.
    4. Open TIF file and apply tweaks like levels, curves, sharpening, noise removal, etc in Photoshop
    5. Save file as JPG.
    6. Upload to website, view and admire to heart's content.

    And all of the above can be done in 15 minutes or less...any longer it'd not be worth doing it.
    Last edited by LifeInMacro; 8th November 2011 at 03:13 PM.
    Family | Health | Happy-ness. . . my Flickr here

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    605

    Default Re: Different HDR processes : Which one works best for you ?

    Quote Originally Posted by wolfcry91 View Post
    Mind sharing the masking/graduation/overlaying techniques?
    This is the "traditional" photoshop technique, taking different exposed shots and selectively masking the areas that you want or don't want. It's painful, but some people like this because of the fine control they can exert over the final image. That's why software like Photomatix exists to ease the pain.
    Family | Health | Happy-ness. . . my Flickr here

  8. #8

    Default Re: Different HDR processes : Which one works best for you ?

    Yes, it is sometimes painful detail work. For example ,mask want you want by hand, edit all the settings till it looks like you want it , save the layer, inverse the selection, edit , save , and so on ... Or you use to 2 pictures wih different gradients that you overlay . I only do this , when I have a lot of time on my hands, otherwise I use a method similar as described by LifeinMarco above, just with the difference that I use NIK HDR software.
    Or , sometimes , if the raw file has already enough information inside that I can use, I do selective raw editing .

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •