![]() |
|
|||||||
| World of Nature Images of animals taken in the wild, in captivity or of pets in your home. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North
Posts: 74
|
This is my first posting, hope to share the photos and hear some comments.
These are some of the inhabitants from the Long Kang near my house Egretta Thula (Snowy Egret) ![]() Some White Throated King Fisher (In fact there are 4 of them) I can only show some recorded shots as all the shots are really bad. ![]() I hope I got all the names right. In fact there are some other inhabitants other then those I show. Will hopefully capture them (photographs of cause) and share with you guys. Hope to learn more from you guys. Regards Last edited by All Blacks; 2nd November 2004 at 02:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,116
|
I think for this region, we use Little Egret more.
There is a very slight difference. http://www.oceanwanderers.com/LTEGRT.html Your little egret is really a great capture. Very detailed, which lens did you use and how close were you? I am sure the originals are even better as your filesize is only 48K which is very small. Else you must be very close, need some skills here to get so close even though they are common. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North
Posts: 74
|
Regards |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tampines
Posts: 3,315
|
Pretty good catch there. Not too bad considering you used 2 xTC.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North
Posts: 74
|
Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,116
|
Using the 50-500 too, and most of the time cannot really use the Sigma EX TC2x. Gotta stop down to f20-22, else at f13-16, you only get a bigger image but quality is worse than 50-500 by itself. What this means is that you take a pic from the 50-500 only and resize to 200%, then compare side by side with another pic with the 2X. The 50-500 pic w/o 2X wins as far as optical quality (ie CA, absolute optical resolution, contrast) is concerned. Coz no point having more pixels but of much worse quality.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North
Posts: 74
|
Thanks and Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West side of S'pore
Posts: 5,515
|
Commendable efforts there, given that you were using a 2X TC with the Sigma 50-500. Not the best of combos under any circumstance but surprisngly the image quality is acceptable here, especially the Little Egret shot. What aperture did you stop down to?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: BN
Posts: 1,228
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Third rock from the Sun
Posts: 1,773
|
Good effort! Well done and keep those pics coming in
Cheers
__________________
The place where I can spread my wings, and soar the sky at dawn - I belong |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North
Posts: 74
|
Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North
Posts: 74
|
Regards |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|