![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 106
|
I'm still undecided between the two. Which one is better? My budget is less than $250.
My main consideration is prints quality. If it can match what I see on my screen, in terms of color, sharpness, etc., I'll be very happy. The second consideration is the durability of prints. What is the advantage of having 6 individual tanks? will it produce better printing quality? How is Pixma i1000 quality? Which brand is more cost saving? Thanks for any comments/suggestions. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 68
|
I am not sure about the Epson but I am using the i4000 with no complaints. The i4000 is slightly above your budget and may be you can consider the i3000. The i1000 seem to be entry level stuff. I have blown up the pictures taken with my Canon 20D and is very happy with the results. If you want a better resolution go for the i5000.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 947
|
Hi Scott,
First the colour matching part... Unless your screen is properly calibrated with calibration hardware, matching the screen to print results is usually a hit-and-miss thingie... In terms of durability, the dye prints by the major brands can reach up to 25 years under proper conditions. Pigment inks can last a claimed 100 years, but there're drawbacks such as not being able to print on most glossy photo papers and the colour gamut may not be as wide as dye inks. Choose between dye inks and pigment inks - my choice is dye inks for the incredible colour range and the ability to print on both glossy and matte paper. 25 years is more than sufficient for me, although Canon claims 100 years archival for its Photo Paper Pro paper. The PIXMA iP5000 is the one to go for, if you don't mind spending a bit more. It's the world's first and only 1-picolitre ink droplet printer and offering 9600dpi. And if budget is not a constraint, then plunge for the 8-colour iP8500, which adds red and green to the usual 6-colour. The results should theorectically be as good as my friend's 8-ink Canon i9950, which is really superb. The SITEX show is just around the corner... maybe you should wait till then. All the major players are present, you can see the results for yourself, and who knows... maybe get a really good bargain? ![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The heart of the Abyss
Posts: 2,319
|
Agree... Get a few of your pictures that you feel will most test the printers and let them print it out...
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bishan
Posts: 245
|
I personally think PIXMA ip3000 and above are cooler than epson one
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 106
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 106
|
How about Epson CX3500?
Does anyone have this all-in-one printer? any comments... |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 947
|
Hi Scott,
Wait until SITEX... usually they allow customers to print one image for testing... at least Canon, Epson and HP do... |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The heart of the Abyss
Posts: 2,319
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 486
|
My vote goes to Epson.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 705
|
Pixma printer specially just for print photo only?
__________________
The best reward in life is laughter |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|