![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore, Central
Posts: 626
|
hi all, currently using a 24mm lens on my f80. its a great lens with excellent build, and picture quality (flares easily though) but after my latest trip where i was juggling multiple lenses during changes, i am toying with the idea of getting a wide angle zoom that can give me some more flexibility in composition etc.
my current choices are the nikon 24-85g and the 28-105d... both of which have excellent reviews from most people, cost about the same used ($350~$400) and both of which have their plus points i.e. 24-85g has afs and a wider wide end, and 28-105 has a 1:2 macro mode (i dont have a macro lens). any comments are welcome!! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guests
Posts: n/a
|
The 28-105 is a great sharp lens that can be used for macro work. Take a look at my macro gallery - all of the shots were taken with this lens. As were all the model photos too. A very versatile lens that gives great sharp images. I leave it to ESPN to add the obvious conclusion
![]() |
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,475
|
![]() |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
AF-S 17-35 f/2.8
After this you don't need any more... heehee ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West side of S'pore
Posts: 5,512
|
Hi buddy, you forgot one important factor...what is your budget like?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore, Central
Posts: 626
|
hi nemesis, thanks for your reply. i know third party lenses are cheaper but i really like the feel and build of a nikkor lens.. hi espn, i cant afford lenses like the 17-35 lah! was thinking about the 18-35 (i.e. poor cousin to the 17-35) for the longest time, but couldnt bring myself to pay 800+ for it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sing Ga Po
Posts: 41
|
28-105 is a good lens. But thought the price is higher than 450?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
18-35's pretty decent being 1/3 the price of the 17-35. You won't regret having it.
But just a kind comment, if down the road you know you will upgrade further, seriously, save up and go for the best and avoid buy/sell, during the 'trade' you lose $. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 182
|
I still have this lens and at one time, it was my only AF lens. Second-hand prices are about $400 +/-, depending on condition. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 503
|
try Tamron 24-135! Equally sharp, wider, longer, and have macro mode!
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore, Central
Posts: 626
|
cheers! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,475
|
Being brand consious is one thing, buying something thats not good enuff becos it has the name or logo is worse... |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bt Panjang
Posts: 1,238
|
I am that sort who will save up to get the best the market can offer, so you don't need to worry about upgrading in the future
And it will also clear whatever doubts you will have regarding your equipment, so you have no reason to blame your lense if the picture is not nice and also knowing that you have the best the market can offer, you can shoot with more confident ![]()
__________________
[/spending][/BBB][/FUN] |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore, Central
Posts: 626
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 136
|
This can be applied to choosing a future wife as well!!! cheers, bcoolboy |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bt Panjang
Posts: 1,238
|
Was at the HSBC Wakeboard World Cup last Sunday. Started taking photos with my VR 70-200 at the far end.
After a while, I realised that all the people around me was using Tamron, and Sigma, Tokina... So was pretty proud of my VR Then I walked nearer to the grand stand... The nearer I got to the grand stand, so does the quality of the lenses used by the photographers there! And when I was beside the grand stand, my god!! There are no less than 8 (non-professional) photographers each with their VR 70-200!!!! Hmmm.... talk about equipment giving you the level of confident. ![]()
__________________
[/spending][/BBB][/FUN] |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|