Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2011

  1. #1

    Default Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2011

    Something interesting I came across to share.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14792580

  2. #2

    Default Re: Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2011

    Interesting. The image of Orion, showing the Benard Loop, which is one really difficult target, the subs are only like 3 minutes exposure for RGB, 5 minutes for luminescence, and 15 minutes for H-alpha. Definitely doable here in Singapore.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Yishun
    Posts
    90

    Default Re: Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2011

    wow, how did they take so detailed high resolution photos of sth so deep in space?

  4. #4

    Default Re: Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2011

    Quote Originally Posted by at0m87 View Post
    wow, how did they take so detailed high resolution photos of sth so deep in space?
    becos they have billion dollars budget and us.... at most thousand dollars budget....
    and as well as a really dark and clear night sky....
    Coolthought - 冷静思考 - クールだ http://xaa.xanga.com/0aba0666d143253.../t35917343.gif

  5. #5

    Default Re: Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2011

    even my 500mm which cost me an arm and a leg cant take this shots, I really wonder wat they use to shoot these planets... do the equipment they use require them to sell their lungs, livers or heart?

  6. #6

    Default Re: Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2011

    Not really true. Don't need to sell your organs.

    This was taken with a $80 webcam and a $800 telescope on a regular panning tripod:
    http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot..._4091554_n.jpg

    This was taken only with a 200mm lens:
    http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot..._7706300_n.jpg

    Both shot in sg with severe light pollution.
    Of course, the results are not fantastic like those in the video, but there are tricks to further improve image quality.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2011

    Quote Originally Posted by ArchRival View Post
    Not really true. Don't need to sell your organs.

    This was taken with a $80 webcam and a $800 telescope on a regular panning tripod:
    http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot..._4091554_n.jpg

    This was taken only with a 200mm lens:
    http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot..._7706300_n.jpg

    Both shot in sg with severe light pollution.
    Of course, the results are not fantastic like those in the video, but there are tricks to further improve image quality.
    Wow! Cool. Are they taken in Singapore?
    D3 D800 RX-1 X100 E-M5 My flickr

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Yishun
    Posts
    90

    Default Re: Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2011

    wah go where take? i assume the best place to take this photo would be p.Tekong(impossible) p.ubin or other islands...

  9. #9
    Senior Member bonrya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    In a mobile cage
    Posts
    2,633

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ArchRival
    Not really true. Don't need to sell your organs.

    This was taken with a $80 webcam and a $800 telescope on a regular panning tripod:
    http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot..._4091554_n.jpg

    This was taken only with a 200mm lens:
    http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot..._7706300_n.jpg

    Both shot in sg with severe light pollution.
    Of course, the results are not fantastic like those in the video, but there are tricks to further improve image quality.
    It'll be nice if you/someone could share techniques on how to get these. interested to learn in practical.
    My Flickr
    ~Neko baka

  10. #10

    Default Re: Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2011

    those deep space of stars, how they took it? is it wide angle or ultra zoom in ah? the dragon, orion?

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Yishun
    Posts
    90

    Default Re: Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2011

    Quote Originally Posted by bonrya View Post
    It'll be nice if you/someone could share techniques on how to get these. interested to learn in practical.
    yea i am interested too. i have a 300mm lens.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2011

    When it comes to taking the night sky, you have to decide what targets you want.
    If you are after constellations, you need wide angle lenses, maybe 30+mm. This is a shot of Orion at 70mm, and it's not enough to capture the entire constellation. http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot..._1408972_n.jpg.

    The image of Orion in the video was taken with a Takahashi FSQ, and FSQs are known to be 500mm focal length, F/5. The author used a reducer to bring it down to 380mm at F/3.6. This means he shot parts of the constellation and combined it into a mosiac. Very time consuming and difficult to execute well, but his efforts totally paid off.

    The easiest start is to shoot moon and planets. Here focal length wins, but the smart thing to do is ditch your camera lenses and get a cheap telescope instead. A 1500mm, 6" aperture telescope cost $1.3k, which is about same as a good 200-300mm telephoto. A small 5 to 6" aperture cassegrain on a tripod with gear head beats even the most expensive telephotos hands down in this category. All you need is an adaptor to mate your camera to the telescope. There are rigs to hold pns cameras to shoot through the telescope eyepiece, so your camera don't need to be high-end. And of course there are adaptors for slrs. The adaptors are all standard sized and readily available.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •