![]() |
|
|||||||
| Underwater Photography All things nautically & photographically related. Dive in!! |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 455
|
Hi All,
Can anyone pls advise why I should buy the 105 mm over the 60 mm and vice versa......... Many thanks....... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OZilla
Posts: 1,965
|
Hi h2o,
Well First off, what system are you using, are you using a DSLR or SLR? I've not really used a DLSR underwater, but to my limited knowledge, with a DSLR, a easier to use lens would be the 60mm if you need a higher magnification, get a woody's diopter. Inherently i find the 60mm easier and more versatile than the 105, especially with the crop factor, you're getting a 90mm lens. Though so, i've used the 105 more on the 90X in OZ. With autofocus, it's hard sometimes to achieve the focus point. you may want to half-press to focus and move your camera inwards/outwards to achieve the focus point you desire. I simply love the 105 on the 90x. YMMV I've spoken to alot of underwater photographers and they advocate the 60mm then the 15mm FE, then the 105. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,320
|
I'd go along with what Waisj suggested. In fact, I did buy my lens in that sequence.
Unless I am shooting pygmy seahorses, I will always have my 60mm on for macro. I am using a DSLR so that's a 90mm equivalent. Regards Eric |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 203
|
h2o,
I might not be totally right. Just some personal views. 1) 60mm-let you get closer to your subject, thus reduce water column = to better colors & less strobe power wastage (TTL). But skittish creatures hard to approach. 2) 105mm-further away, good for camera shy creatures. There are a lot more pros in this forum that can help you. I am not pro, just a happy shooter. EL |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OZilla
Posts: 1,965
|
Alot of us here aspire to shoot like you leh..... oh.. saw your photos in Asian divers Special... .... .... *koff* Strong current..... feeding......crab......*koff* ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 203
|
*koff* Strong current..... feeding......crab......*koff*
[/quote]Lucky shot...right place...right time.....got the shot. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OZilla
Posts: 1,965
|
you must be real lucky then.... always have lucky shots. /h2o Another point that EL brought up was the working distance between the lenses which is good to consider. With the 60mm lense, my personal experience is that for small creatures, it is a bit harder to light sometimes, coz you are soo close to them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 455
|
hi all,
thanks for all your feedback..... my apologies....i have not revealed that i am still using an slr.......so the crop factor will not affect me......what does affect me is the $$$$ factor....as at the moment i can only afford to buy one lens which i hope will last me for a couple of years before my next investment..... once again many thanks... |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OZilla
Posts: 1,965
|
then again, it depends on what you like to shoot. Again YMMV, what say you Eric & Eric? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 203
|
Waisj- 60mm good choice.......h2o - go for it. You can do wonders with just 1 lens. EL |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 455
|
hi waisj and eric,
thanks for your advice.....i'll take your recommendation and go for the 60..... ok now have to go and bleed myself for the purchase.......b+ blood for sale anyone??? |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 898
|
yeah, 60mm is better u/w.
if for topside, I prefer the 90mm,105mm and 180mm . ![]()
__________________
Kelvin -96622292 |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 898
|
Just have to be patient
__________________
Kelvin -96622292 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,320
|
since you are using the SLR, why not settle for the 90mm macro from Tamron? Something in between.
But the optics of Nikon AFD 60mm is unparalleled. One thing to note is that the port element determines the quality of the optics more than the lens itself. What I am trying to say is that you should match quality lens with quality port, not quality lens with lousy port. Eric |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Off the shoulder of Orion, near the Tannhauser gate
Posts: 202
|
One other question in relation to Eric's reply as above. When you are talking about quality ports, do you advocate only using glass ports or are there any plastic/poly ports out there that are acceptable, in your view? Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,320
|
well, I know glass ports are better quality than "plastic" ports, with mineral glass being the best.
I thought Ikelite ports (which I am using) have a plastic front element but someone told me it's glass. I "guess" all commercial housing and ports should be more than acceptable. Actually, whatever lens you are using (Nikon, Sigma, Tamron), you are also shooting thru the UV filter (on the lens) and ports. Hence the optics can only be as good as the the worst of these 3. (oh, and I forgot about the water column btw the port and the subject, which is usually the worst) Hence other than the Nikon 60mm, my 105mm and 15mm FE are all third party lens. Sorry my last post sounded like I am suggesting u to get the Rolls Royce of everything.....It's just my distorted way of saying no point getting all Nikon lens. By lousy port, I guess I am just referring to that particular plastic bag housing (again someone told me the front element is glass for that also) Eric |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Off the shoulder of Orion, near the Tannhauser gate
Posts: 202
|
Rohan Last edited by RSU; 15th October 2004 at 10:44 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OZilla
Posts: 1,965
|
Ah.... Subal... Fine Austrian Machinery..... Cost both arms and legs and what ever is in between though...... What camera systems are you using may i ask? |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Off the shoulder of Orion, near the Tannhauser gate
Posts: 202
|
Nick : RSU Camera(s) : Oly C3000Z U/W Housing Model :PT-010 Strobe(s) :Epoque ES-150 DS slave Strobe arm(s) : Some brandless L-shaped piece of metal Lighting : UK Mini Q40 Lens(es) : Nope Other equipment : Underwater Kinetics dry case, lots of rechargeable batts, cable ties and old bicycle tubes. Seriously contemplating the Ike housing for D70, plus strobes. Just one arm and one leg, and hopefully I get to keep what's in between.... Rohan Last edited by RSU; 15th October 2004 at 12:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OZilla
Posts: 1,965
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|