care to post some high iso shots? thank you!
ISO1600 and ISO3200 comparisons with G3. Can click to see full size of the original images.
some sample shots on flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/darwinfish105/page1/
looks good at large size. but at original size can see that there only so much you can achieve with a small sensor.
So what's with the Toy lenses wide and fisheye?
Why are they 'toy' and 'cheap'?
No distortion correction? Poor sharpness? Vignetting?
Still I'm not sure its 'toy' performance or 'good enough' performance.
I guess I have to wait for more samples on flickr and such.
Its just going to sit between advanced pns and m4/3 in performance.
Same thing with my GF1.
There is no comparison between it and my K5.
Simply no comparison in usage and absolute photo quality.
But it is a nice camera and is rather good for street/people photography as well as a walk around camera w/o the usual baggage.
I just learn not to click on the 1:1 icon when I am viewing it.
Last edited by pinholecam; 6th September 2011 at 08:55 PM.
The Q has definitely passed the furry cat test! Thanks fengwei.
BTW I think all you guys commenting on the sidelines are overthinking too much with regards to this camera... the image quality is pretty good imo.
Last edited by creampuff; 6th September 2011 at 07:26 PM.
Great to see this thread taking off ..... and the Q looks cute
Deleted 'some' posts to unclutter this thread
btw..... this handsome camera is featured in Clubsnap Photography Community FB page (ha ha ha please remember to click 'like' )
Last edited by ed9119; 7th September 2011 at 08:33 AM.
shaddap and just shoot .... up close
This is what it can do with a SMC Pentax M*800mm f6.7 ED
IMGP0962 by nkenji, on Flickr