Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

  1. #1

    Default 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    As title, confusing to choose between 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90?
    Currently using D90 with kit Len, and feel that kit Len are not fast enough to capture my dearest daughter movement and make the photo blur..
    Furthermore, plan to have a Thailand trip soon, thus may want tp upgrade my gear.
    Pls advice, thank

  2. #2
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    both lenses are rather bulky and heavy, rent anyone of this lens, carry it whole day and do some shoots, than you will know whether do you still want to bring it to your trip.
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  3. #3

    Default Re: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    What is your upgrade route?

    Possible future FX - 24-70.
    Happy with DX - 17-55.

    However, I would advise against making pictures of your daughter at f/2.8 unless you're really good or if the lighting is really poor. The kit lens is often more than capable of the job. Would recommend you to rent/borrow and test the two lenses before making a decision
    Team FX Nikon
    Pet peeve: The word is 'lens', not 'len'

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    447

    Default Re: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    As you didn't mention whether you would upgrade the camera body to FX, so I assume you will only upgrade the lens only. For a apsc camera body, the best match is also a apsc lens. 17-55 is the pro zoom apsc lens for the apsc body such as D90. I recommend this lens for D90.

    The 24-70 on D90 will lose the wide angle as it is equivalent to 36-105mm only.

  5. #5

    Default Re: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    I personally find the 24-70 a little too tight for a walkaround but excellent for Portraitures. It is actually a really sweet lens to use with your D90. Bulky, rather heavy and a nuisance at times for storage, it may be, but is rewarding. Since you are using kit lens, see if you are comfortable with that focal range for a period of time test.......also the 24-70 don't come with the VR, which I thought I may not need too, until some of those times.....ha...ha...!

    Like some of the bros here are saying, if you do have the intention to move on to FX in future it may be a worthwhile investment consideration and at lease till then it is not as tight for a walkaround.....
    Last edited by MacroMarlin; 17th August 2011 at 10:46 AM.
    What I really missed most, is my first SLR. An Olympus OM2 with the Zuiko 35mm f/1.4, back in 1982!

  6. #6

    Default Re: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    have you consider lenses of other makes?

    tokina has a similar zoom lens 16-50 f2.8 (610g)
    tamron 17-50 f2.8 VC (570g)
    and sigma 17-50 f2.8 OS. (565g)
    Probably you might want to take a look at the sigma 17-50.
    A lot more cheaper than the ones you are looking at and quite a bit lighter too at 565g compared to the 2 nikon lenses at 755g and 900g
    Last edited by coolthought; 17th August 2011 at 11:01 AM.
    Coolthought - 冷静思考 - クールだ http://xaa.xanga.com/0aba0666d143253.../t35917343.gif

  7. #7

    Default Re: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    I found that for general travel shots, 17-55 is excellent (I use D90). Bit heavy but bearable for old uncle like me. No regrets so far. Sometimes when real lazy then I just mount a fixed 35mm to swing around. You will train yourself very soon if there is limitations. Quality as we know is from the man.....

  8. #8

    Default Re: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    17-55mm unless u plan to upgrade to FX

  9. #9

    Default Re: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    hi TS,
    I uses prime mostly to capture my active kids ... 50mm f1.4G.
    It gives better bokeh effects than both lenses you mentioned.

  10. #10
    Member endous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Singapore, Woodlands
    Posts
    79

    Default

    I had both 17-55 and 24-70 and using it on my d300. I find that 24-70 is a better lens compared to 17-55 in terms of iq and build quality. I don't shoot wide, so start at 24mm is fine for me. And also 24-70 came with nano coating and there's no need to change lens if you wish to upgrade to fx in the future.

  11. #11

    Default Re: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    I am in favor of the 24-70mm. But both lenses are huge and bulky. You may not appreciate its weight or bulk.

  12. #12

    Default Re: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    I'm using 24-70 on my D300 as well and i like the combination. It's heavy but iq more important to me. Never try 17-55 before.

  13. #13

    Default Re: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    taking pictures of kids what are the recommended settings?
    if on aperiture priority mode go with higher iso for example?

    i was thinking your settings more important than upgrading lens for this purpose.
    D750|24-120 4G|85 1.4G|50AFD|SB-700

  14. #14
    Senior Member ZerocoolAstra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    rainy Singapore
    Posts
    9,523

    Default Re: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    Quote Originally Posted by angrybatman View Post
    As title, confusing to choose between 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90?
    Currently using D90 with kit Len, and feel that kit Len are not fast enough to capture my dearest daughter movement and make the photo blur..
    Furthermore, plan to have a Thailand trip soon, thus may want tp upgrade my gear.
    Pls advice, thank
    What focal length do you mainly use when you photograph your dearest daughter?
    Do you think that not having the 17-23mm focal range will be a 'handicap' in any way? Or do you prefer to have the 56-70mm focal range?
    Exploring! :)

  15. #15

    Default Re: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    i choose 24-70 over 17-55 because i believe 24-70 is a more superior lens in terms of IQ, and upgrading to FF in near future is also my main reason.

    24-70 is not wide enough for landscape for my taste and it'll be abit difficult to shoot HDB/condo indoor as well.

  16. #16

    Default Re: 17-55 or 24-70 to equip with D90

    Tried the 50 f1.8G? Reading the thread, it seems like a excellent lens for the purpose of taking shots of kids

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •