![]() |
|
|||||||
| Sigma/Tamron/Tokina 3rd party lenses/flashes and accessories from Sigma, Tamron and Tokina. |
|
|
| View Poll Results: Sigma 24-70 vs Tamron 28-75 | |||
| Sigma 24-70 f2.8 |
|
99 | 29.73% |
| Tamron 28-75 f2.8 |
|
234 | 70.27% |
| Voters: 333. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 298
|
Could not afford Canon 24-70 so thinking of getting one of this...
Seems the canon users are divided into two camps over this 2 pieces of glass.. QUESTION: WHICH IS BETTER VALUE FOR MONEY?? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
ClubSNAP Idol
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Jalan Suka
Posts: 5,321
|
I'll take the Tamron if I have to choose between the 2; so far I've heard more good reviews on the 28-75mm than the Sigma one. As a matter of fact, I'll be borrowing a close friend's Tamron to cover another close friend's wedding next month ... it's going to be siong man ...
![]() Last edited by Adam Goi; 26th September 2004 at 10:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,116
|
http://www.photozone.de/bindex2.html
Canon EF 2.8 24-70mm USM L 4.16 (3) = very-good Canon EF 2.8 28-70mm USM L 4.15 (5) = very-good Tamron AF 2.8 28-75mm LD XR Aspherical SP 4.14 (3) = very-good Nikkor AF 2.8 35-70mm D 4.11 (5) = very-good Nikkor AF-S 2.8 28-70mm IF ED D 4.05 (4) = very-good Pentax SMC-FA 2.8 28-70mm AL 3.90 (5) = very-good Minolta AF 2.8 28-70mm G 3.76 (4) = very-good Tokina AF 2.8 28-80mm AT-X Pro 3.66 (4) = good Canon EF 2.8-4.0 28-80mm USM L 3.56 (4) = good Sigma AF 2.8 28-70mm EX DF 3.50 (2) = good |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: West
Posts: 1,109
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,737
|
i have a 24-70 f2.8 sigma for sale... (hint, hint)
__________________
http://alextan.net |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 298
|
Tamron Tamron...here i come
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: TheDaysMovie.com
Posts: 1,887
|
sorry to hijack ur thread.... can anyone advise me to get for a super wide... besides sigma 12-24.... coz i`m used to my old nikon 12-24dx.....
cannot dun have so wide.... unless i change to efs mount.... which i bo $$... can someone advise me of any third party that is solid.! |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 762
|
tamron's AF abit slow... dunno abt sigma
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 540
|
i dont trust Sigma, thats why i choose tamron
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: TheDaysMovie.com
Posts: 1,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: TheDaysMovie.com
Posts: 1,887
|
meaning will be ard december or early november....~~~
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore (SengKang)
Posts: 2,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 552
|
definitely the tamron.
it rivals even the mega famous nikon 28-70/2.8. only drawback is slower af, not as good build. but sharpness wise, i'd say probably as good as the canon L! get it u confirm no regert. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 345
|
yup, tamron gets my vote !
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Clementi
Posts: 2,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 370
|
i've just gotten my tamron 28-75. haven't had much chance to use it but so far, i like it.
the af speed is alright for me, not too noisy and fine in low light. thats comparing to my tamron 18-200 though. can't comment much on the iq of my own lens yet because i've not had the chance to shooot much with it yet. many great reviews though!
__________________
My Flickr |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 896
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|