Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

  1. #1

    Default A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    I'm curious about how are cameras are categorised. For example, d90 is said to be an intermediate level DSLR. D3000, 3100, 5000, 5100 are known as entry levels. What features do they need to possess to be categorised under a certain category. Please do not flame me if this is a redundant question. Thanks to all!

  2. #2
    Senior Member madmartian's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Outer Space
    Posts
    20,227

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    I tot you are very clever? ...............................
    Take the shot!

  3. #3

    Default

    It's just a nick. I had no idea what nick to use so I came up with this-.-

  4. #4

    Default

    How about this:

    Entry level: < $1200
    semi pro: $1201 to $2499
    Pro: > $2500

    Haha

  5. #5
    Senior Member edutilos-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    The Universe
    Posts
    5,991

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    Quote Originally Posted by iamveryclever View Post
    I'm curious about how are cameras are categorised. For example, d90 is said to be an intermediate level DSLR. D3000, 3100, 5000, 5100 are known as entry levels. What features do they need to possess to be categorised under a certain category. Please do not flame me if this is a redundant question. Thanks to all!
    It is very rudimentary.

    For example, for some funny reason, I have seen Pentax K-5 being placed together with Canon 550D before, because of the "megapixel" count. This is despite the fact that the Canon 550D is more or less a mid-entry level camera, while the K-5 is far more advanced. That same article naturally went on to say that the 550D was cheaper, which was ridiculous.

    It really depends on how credible the site/magazine/writer is.

    These days various companies have very segregated levels. It used to be simpler - with entry level, mid-range/prosumer and professional, where professional would be the flagship cameras (usually, based on my understanding). These days, just take a look at the Canon lineup for example, you have the Canon 1100D, Canon 600D, Canon 60D, Canon 7D, Canon 5D M2, Canon 1D Mark III. The first two differentiate the entry level market further, the Canon 60D/7D differentiate the mid-range/prosumer market further, and well, I'm not sure where the Canon 5D M2 falls, while 1DM3 is the flagship.

    Same for Nikon, naturally. It's just really really messy, and I can't even keep track of Sony with their translucent mirror offerings and the normal DSLRs (and they have a huge slew of normal DSLRs, it seems).

  6. #6

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    actually i think nikon group them according the FPS and amount af points

  7. #7

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    Quote Originally Posted by dardar View Post
    actually i think nikon group them according the FPS and amount af points
    not true, d300s has 7fps while d700 has 5fps...

  8. #8
    Member Irvine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    North? South? East? West?
    Posts
    1,037

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    Quote Originally Posted by strikeback4 View Post
    not true, d300s has 7fps while d700 has 5fps...
    but they can both achieve 8 fps with battery grip
    Google is your friend. Make use of it.

  9. #9
    Senior Member ovaltinemilo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sin jia Po lah
    Posts
    2,820

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    for me, I take it as full frame= pro level..APSC=Amateur level... all the sub category in amateur level always change depending on certain website/magazine point of view..hard to follow...haha..2 category..that's it...haha
    ...:::..::.Nikon.::.:::..
    RGB Metering & Focusing.

  10. #10

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    Quote Originally Posted by ovaltinemilo View Post
    for me, I take it as full frame= pro level..APSC=Amateur level... all the sub category in amateur level always change depending on certain website/magazine point of view..hard to follow...haha..2 category..that's it...haha
    but the D300s and D7000 is known as a 'pro' level in the DX body right? Somehow i don't understand why is there the D3000, 5000, 7000, D80,90, and D300s. For DX itself there are like 3 sub categories already.

  11. #11
    Member Irvine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    North? South? East? West?
    Posts
    1,037

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    Quote Originally Posted by dardar View Post
    actually i think nikon group them according the FPS and amount af points
    FPS isnt a gd way to categorize them. look at d3x. it's a professional body but with 5 fps only
    Google is your friend. Make use of it.

  12. #12
    Member Irvine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    North? South? East? West?
    Posts
    1,037

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    Quote Originally Posted by iamveryclever View Post
    but the D300s and D7000 is known as a 'pro' level in the DX body right? Somehow i don't understand why is there the D3000, 5000, 7000, D80,90, and D300s. For DX itself there are like 3 sub categories already.
    D7000 isnt a pro level DX body as categorized by nikon professional services.
    Google is your friend. Make use of it.

  13. #13
    Member Irvine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    North? South? East? West?
    Posts
    1,037

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    fyi, this is the list NPS came up with for professional bodies

    http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/threa...?highlight=NPS

    from here u can see for urself, the Dxxx series onwards r considered professional bodies.
    Last edited by Irvine; 24th July 2011 at 01:17 AM.
    Google is your friend. Make use of it.

  14. #14

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    Quote Originally Posted by Irvine View Post
    fyi, this is the list NPS came up with for professional bodies

    http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/threa...?highlight=NPS

    from here u can see for urself, the Dxxx series onwards r considered professional bodies.
    thanks for your information! still i don't really understand how do they categorise their camera ranges. I find it interesting though.

  15. #15

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    Quote Originally Posted by iamveryclever View Post
    I'm curious about how are cameras are categorised. For example, d90 is said to be an intermediate level DSLR. D3000, 3100, 5000, 5100 are known as entry levels. What features do they need to possess to be categorised under a certain category. Please do not flame me if this is a redundant question. Thanks to all!
    Camera companies look into a lot of factors to categorize their DSLR like the sensor size, partial/full magnesium alloy body, weather sealing, viewfinder coverage, frame per sec, shutter lifespan, AF points & system, high ISO noise control and many others. And they will pack all those stuffs into the camera according to the user they wanna target at and categorize accordingly.
    | 5D Mark III | 24-70mm F2.8L MK II | 70-200mm F2.8L IS MK II | 600 EX-RT | Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG (A) |

  16. #16

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    Basically to me, is just now these brands market themselves. For nikon entry level (consumer lever), the price gap from D3100 to D5100 is lower than D5100 to D90. So it gives the conception to customers "spend 100+ dollars more and can get a better cam, must as well buy D5100 as to D3100" Thus, earning more due to a higher profit margin.

    From D90 to D7000, the price gap is almost similar of D5100 to D90. That's why so many people claim that D7000 is a good value for money DSLR and a lot of people buy! Check the price gap of the pro DSLR and note the difference.

    To me, is a marketing strategy for consumer's psychology to let them earn more money

  17. #17

    Default

    Just wanna add in something interesting, for those who didn't really notice.

    Entry level cameras (D5100) - no top LCD display

    Mid entry cameras (D7k) - small top LCD display

    Semi-pro/pro - large LCD display

  18. #18
    Member Irvine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    North? South? East? West?
    Posts
    1,037

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    Quote Originally Posted by iamveryclever View Post
    thanks for your information! still i don't really understand how do they categorise their camera ranges. I find it interesting though.
    they categorise their cameras based on stuff like construction, ergonomics, features n specs.
    Google is your friend. Make use of it.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    3,786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sgdevilzz
    Just wanna add in something interesting, for those who didn't really notice.

    Entry level cameras (D5100) - no top LCD display

    Mid entry cameras (D7k) - small top LCD display

    Semi-pro/pro - large LCD display
    :P D700 has smaller top LCD than D300s
    Equipment: D800|D700|11-16|28-75|105 Micro VR|50 F1.4G|85 F1.8G
    Through the Lens of Cowseye

  20. #20
    Member Irvine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    North? South? East? West?
    Posts
    1,037

    Default Re: A curious question on how are DSLRs categorised.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cowseye View Post
    :P D700 has smaller top LCD than D300s
    n to add on, it's bout the same size as d90/d7000's top lcd's size
    Google is your friend. Make use of it.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •