![]() |
|
|||||||
| Printers and Scanners Discuss printing and scanning topics here |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 407
|
Dear Clubsnappers,
I am thinking to buy the Minolta Dual Scan IV to scan negatives up to 300dpi or above for A4 / A3 publication purposes. As the Dual Scan IV indicates 3,200dpi, does that means that it is over specified for my need? In thats the case, i can actually look for lower dpi scanners at a lower price to meet my needs. Is that right? Kindly advise. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 407
|
Any kind soul to enlighten me on this?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 314
|
As a 35 mm negative is 36x24 mm in size (if I'm not wrong), scanning at 300 dpi would mean a final output of only approx 450x300 size! That's not enough to print at A6 size let alone A4 and A3.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 407
|
According to general magazine publishers, they require prints at 300dpi or larger for A4 / A3 publications.
That is why i intend to buy a scanner that can meet my needs. I using film camera and got no intention and budget to change to DSLR at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Western SG
Posts: 1,507
|
On the other hand, you can get shops to do it for you (scan into CD as you process your film with them) Try ColorLab (they have high resolution called 16base) or Grace Digital The scan image can print at A4 size. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 738
|
When the magazine people say 300 dpi for their A4/A3 publications, A4 is 8.27 inch x 11.69 inch, so if you need print full page A4 at 300dpi, you need an image size of 2481 x 3507. now for film scanners, as pointed out earlier, 300dpi scan results in very small file because the full frame is barely more than an inch wide. Therefore, if you intend to print the same size as the tiny film negative on the A4/A3 or whatever size paper, the 300dpi scan is fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: singapore
Posts: 210
|
you need a final output of 2481 X 3507. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Eastern Zone
Posts: 849
|
Yes, you are right. General magazine publishers would have their scans made at 300dpi.
The Minolta Dual Scan IV is not over spec if you want to blow up to A4/A3 for publication purposes. You should look at the max. pixel which is 3120 x 4680 (H x W) http://konicaminolta.com/products/co...ification.html To blow up to A4(11.69"x8.27") at 300 dpi, you would need to have :- (height) 8..27 x 300 = 2481 pixels (width) 11.69 x 300 = 3507 pixels For A3 scans, the resolution to use is 260 dpi, which would have :- (height) 11.69" x 260 = 3039 pixels (width) 16.53" x 260 = 4297 pixels Which are well within the specs of the scanner. If you have doubts, this link could help :- http://www.guides.sk/scantips2 Last edited by chantyeroop; 25th September 2004 at 12:02 AM. Reason: wrong url given and to emphasize some text |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: TBC
Posts: 948
|
A high dpi scanner would be able to resolve more details in your target i.e. negative, photo, etc. If you compare a 1200dpi and a 3200dpi scanner, the 3200dpi scanner will definitely pick up more detail. Even if you only want to print a 4"x6" image at 300dpi, it's better to scan at higher dpi and then resize it to get a better result for print. Of course it also depends on your original target. If you were to scan a 2"x3" image from a magazine which was printed at 250-300dpi, scanning at 1200dpi wouldn't result in a much better scan as at 300dpi or 600dpi because there isn't enough detail to benefit. If you are scanning film to print at A4 then the benefit can be clearly seen.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|