ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > General, Reviews, Tech Talk

General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat.


 
Thread Tools
Old 19th September 2004   #1
Jeff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,513
Default Having to many lenses kill creativity?

Well, I was very happy when I got my first prime. Experimented with all sorts of ways to maximise its usage. Then I became greedy, I bought another prime 6 months later. I started to indulge in that new lens and neglected the older prime. Also, I found that I have to lug along these lenses whenever I go shooting cause I "do not know" when I'll need them. Most important, I have become more lazy to try different ways of shooting due to the increasing weight on my back. Then I broke the vicious cycle of lens collection (thank goodness) and decided to get my priorities right. One by one, I sell them, though with good sadness . Now, I am much happier although my choices are more restricted.

Further, I found my shooting habits change as I grow(me not that old). Is that normal? Previously I would only shoot avians (guess it's a work hazard)but now I am infatuated with portraitures. (really, i m 2nd yr into serious shooting only )

So having too many lenses is bad for creativity? & health? & pocket?

Last edited by Jeff; 19th September 2004 at 10:54 PM.
Jeff is offline  
Old 19th September 2004   #2
ndroo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: www.fuzzyeyeballs.com
Posts: 6,717
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff
So having too many lenses are bad for creativity? & health? & pocket?
okie i'm still in my 1st year into phtography and my answer to the above 3 is NO, YES, VERY YES!
__________________
fuzzyeyeballs
ndroo is offline  
Old 19th September 2004   #3
AReality
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,395
Default

get zoom lenses.
solves your problem
__________________
.
The
Visual Journalist
AReality is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 19th September 2004   #4
kex
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: beebox
Posts: 2,101
Default

bad for pocket.good for motivation though,makes u wanna go out shooting.
kex is online now  
Old 19th September 2004   #5
Jeff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,513
Default

Originally Posted by renegade
okie i'm still in my 1st year into phtography and my answer to the above 3 is NO, YES, VERY YES!
Well, occasionally the light bulb will go BING!! but not as frequent as before.
Jeff is offline  
Old 19th September 2004   #6
Jeff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,513
Default

Originally Posted by AReality
get zoom lenses.
solves your problem
Really doesn't help. It either wide or tele end. Been there done that. Once prime, forever prime. A
Jeff is offline  
Old 19th September 2004   #7
rainman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In my own world
Posts: 1,112
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff
Really doesn't help. It either wide or tele end. Been there done that. Once prime, forever prime. A
Get zoom lens...more versatile. Unless u know u will be shooting at that focal length frequently.

I agree that prime is good..not only it is sharp, it is light and in a way it "forces" to move ur feet, and when u does....u actually shoot at diff angle and mayb at diff perspective.

Is this the creativity u r trying to say?
rainman is offline  
Old 20th September 2004   #8
ST1100
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Singapore, Bedok
Posts: 1,801
Default

i wouldn't say that having too many lenses kills creativity.

In fact, i don't feel the number of lenses should influence your creativity. i'd rather have 'go through' more lenses so that i can 'learn' that lens' point of view. The 'learned' point of view becomes one more way i can visualize the picture in my head before i pick the camera.

Exceptions would be fisheyes, ultra-wides (12mm-19mm) and maybe tilt-shift lenses. These lenses distort reality somewhat and are very hard to pre-visualize without actually looking through the viewfinder.
ST1100 is offline  
Old 20th September 2004   #9
satan_18349
Member
 
satan_18349's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: hell 極樂世&
Posts: 1,505
Default

Get the trinity...you won't need anything else...
satan_18349 is offline  
Old 20th September 2004   #10
Jeff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,513
Default

Originally Posted by ST1100

i'd rather have 'go through' more lenses so that i can 'learn' that lens' point of view. The 'learned' point of view becomes one more way i can visualize the picture in my head before i pick the camera.
Ah, finally something true to the heart. I only started to understand the 'visualise the pix' part recently. It does help in imparting more soul to the shot.
Jeff is offline  
Old 20th September 2004   #11
jsbn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Planet Eropagnis
Posts: 2,977
Default

Hmm... Not sure abt u guys since I'm juz a newbie.

But I think, IMHO, for any new photographers aspiring to shoot, the best is to start with 3 lens:

The new EFS 10-22mm, the stock EFS 18-55mm and a EF 75-300.

Wide angle, medium range and long range looks well covered in my ameuter opinion. At least dat's wad I think. Wad do u guys think?
jsbn is offline  
Old 20th September 2004   #12
Snowcrash
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Western SG
Posts: 1,507
Default

Originally Posted by ST1100
i wouldn't say that having too many lenses kills creativity.

In fact, i don't feel the number of lenses should influence your creativity. i'd rather have 'go through' more lenses so that i can 'learn' that lens' point of view. The 'learned' point of view becomes one more way i can visualize the picture in my head before i pick the camera.

Exceptions would be fisheyes, ultra-wides (12mm-19mm) and maybe tilt-shift lenses. These lenses distort reality somewhat and are very hard to pre-visualize without actually looking through the viewfinder.
I share the same view as you and additional pointers:

the learning process of that lens 'point of view' is different for everyone.

YOU must learn to visualize it then move on. Prime have the advantage here over zoom for beginners.

Try reading the book "learning to see creatively" 2nd edition. The author had switched to a 'street zoom' compare to 50mm in his 1st edition.
Snowcrash is offline  
Old 20th September 2004   #13
mpenza
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
Default

I've quite a few lenses but don't bring everything out at one go. Generally at most two lenses (24-85 or 35 and one tele zoom or prime).
mpenza is offline  
Old 20th September 2004   #14
espn
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
Default

I normally bring 1 out that's all. (In case everybody thinks espn owns the WHOLE of all the Nikon lenses, IT'S A LIE, I only own about 25%... that's all , j/k).

Go shoot with a 50mm and sometimes a zoom and sometimes a wide, it really makes a different in style.

I remember I only had a 50mm to play with, then a zoom and finally a wide, took them out individually and learnt quite a bit in composition (although till now still nothing breakthrough).

In short, you don't need a lot of lenses, you just need to know what you need. I do bring ALL out, but that's on very special occassions.
espn is offline  
Old 20th September 2004   #15
Clown
Moderator
 
Clown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,814
Default

Originally Posted by espn
I normally bring 1 out that's all. (In case everybody thinks espn owns the WHOLE of all the Nikon lenses, IT'S A LIE, I only own about 25%... that's all , j/k).

Go shoot with a 50mm and sometimes a zoom and sometimes a wide, it really makes a different in style.

I remember I only had a 50mm to play with, then a zoom and finally a wide, took them out individually and learnt quite a bit in composition (although till now still nothing breakthrough).

In short, you don't need a lot of lenses, you just need to know what you need. I do bring ALL out, but that's on very special occassions.
only on NC wanking sessions rite? hahaha...
Clown is offline  
Old 20th September 2004   #16
denniskee
Senior Member
 
denniskee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: bukit batok
Posts: 4,212
Default

24mm, 50mm, 100mm, if add 100mm+ 2xtc (cheap cheap $70 MC7) = 200mm. I have to walk alot more to explore all possible angle because i find changing lens abit troublesome.

not sure if you consider 3 lens + 1tc is too many. This is only my personally opinion.

I used to shoot with zoom lens alot, but find that I tends to be very lazy due to the convenience of zooming in and out to frame the subject. As such, I find zoom lens does kill creativity to a certain extent.
__________________
photography makes one sees things from all angles.
denniskee is offline  
Old 20th September 2004   #17
marios_pittas
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 651
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff
Well, I was very happy when I got my first prime. Experimented with all sorts of ways to maximise its usage. Then I became greedy, I bought another prime 6 months later. I started to indulge in that new lens and neglected the older prime. Also, I found that I have to lug along these lenses whenever I go shooting cause I "do not know" when I'll need them. Most important, I have become more lazy to try different ways of shooting due to the increasing weight on my back. Then I broke the vicious cycle of lens collection (thank goodness) and decided to get my priorities right. One by one, I sell them, though with good sadness . Now, I am much happier although my choices are more restricted.

Further, I found my shooting habits change as I grow(me not that old). Is that normal? Previously I would only shoot avians (guess it's a work hazard)but now I am infatuated with portraitures. (really, i m 2nd yr into serious shooting only )

So having too many lenses is bad for creativity? & health? & pocket?
Shooting habits, styles, and interests will change as you go though life in general (become more mature etc.) and as you go through the photography world (more shooting, seeing other peoples photos, seeing works by famous photographers etc.).

I found that that for my shooting most of the time I need only 2 lenses. A moderate tele / normal and a wide-angle. I do have 4 primes (18mm, 28mm, 50mm and 100mm) but I only take 2 with me, maximum 3, and when revewing what I shoot I realise that I may have used only 1 lens, maybe 2 but rarely 3. So most of the time I take the 18mm and 50mm.. some times I will take the 100mm too.

I have found that for what I shoot (I am assuming 35mm rather than digital or other formats):
- 24~35mm can be covered with the 28mm
- 40~70mm can be covered with the 50mm
- 80~135mm can be covered with the 100mm

Amusingly enough I have replicated the same list of lenses in my 645 set up, since I shoot the same things. I think the limited set-up helps me to understand "how" to take the shots since I know what the these lenses can do (i.e. how the world would look like through these lenses).. I guess with less choices I get more practise?

One possibility that you may consider is to save yourself some money and go through your negs and see what you usually shoot and understand what lenses are usually needed for that. Then focus on buying/practising/pushing the limits of those lenses.

In my mind, I think too much of anything is not healthy
marios_pittas is offline  
Old 20th September 2004   #18
Ah Pao
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,578
Default

Originally Posted by denniskee
I used to shoot with zoom lens alot, but find that I tends to be very lazy due to the convenience of zooming in and out to frame the subject. As such, I find zoom lens does kill creativity to a certain extent.
Zoom lens ultimately brings about more convenience compared to a prime in many aspects--weight and price (compared to a range of equivalent primes), but loses out in optical performance.

I find it rather interesting to hear how zoom lens can 'kill' creativity. Being 'lazy' to zoom with the feet doesn't make a picture less good, and since the zoom lens allows the photographer to look through every possible framing within the zoom range, it's tough to argue that it 'kills' creativity. (denniskee, no offence, not attack you, but the point at hand. ) I hope we are not having the mindset of "prime wins zoom because less people know how to use it"...

Very often I find myself visualising a picture, and yet unable to capture it, not because of the lens I use (zoom or prime), but the wrong moment, wrong angle or wrong light.
Ah Pao is offline  
Old 20th September 2004   #19
espn
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
Default

Originally Posted by Clown
only on NC wanking sessions rite? hahaha...
How often do you see me bringing my stuff down on NC?
espn is offline  
Old 20th September 2004   #20
BraveHart
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 322
Default

I don't think having too many lens kills creativity....its getting too hung up over the specification and limitations of any particular lens that kills creativity.
BraveHart is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 12:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.14370 seconds with 7 queries