![]() |
|
|||||||
| General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,513
|
Well, I was very happy when I got my first prime. Experimented with all sorts of ways to maximise its usage. Then I became greedy, I bought another prime 6 months later. I started to indulge in that new lens and neglected the older prime. Also, I found that I have to lug along these lenses whenever I go shooting cause I "do not know" when I'll need them. Most important, I have become more lazy to try different ways of shooting due to the increasing weight on my back. Then I broke the vicious cycle of lens collection (thank goodness) and decided to get my priorities right. One by one, I sell them, though with good sadness
. Now, I am much happier although my choices are more restricted.Further, I found my shooting habits change as I grow(me not that old). Is that normal? Previously I would only shoot avians (guess it's a work hazard)but now I am infatuated with portraitures. (really, i m 2nd yr into serious shooting only )So having too many lenses is bad for creativity? & health? & pocket? Last edited by Jeff; 19th September 2004 at 10:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: www.fuzzyeyeballs.com
Posts: 6,717
|
__________________
fuzzyeyeballs |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,395
|
get zoom lenses.
solves your problem |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: beebox
Posts: 2,101
|
bad for pocket.good for motivation though,makes u wanna go out shooting.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In my own world
Posts: 1,112
|
I agree that prime is good..not only it is sharp, it is light and in a way it "forces" to move ur feet, and when u does....u actually shoot at diff angle and mayb at diff perspective. Is this the creativity u r trying to say? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Singapore, Bedok
Posts: 1,801
|
i wouldn't say that having too many lenses kills creativity.
In fact, i don't feel the number of lenses should influence your creativity. i'd rather have 'go through' more lenses so that i can 'learn' that lens' point of view. The 'learned' point of view becomes one more way i can visualize the picture in my head before i pick the camera. Exceptions would be fisheyes, ultra-wides (12mm-19mm) and maybe tilt-shift lenses. These lenses distort reality somewhat and are very hard to pre-visualize without actually looking through the viewfinder. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: hell 極樂世&
Posts: 1,505
|
Get the trinity...you won't need anything else...
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Planet Eropagnis
Posts: 2,977
|
Hmm... Not sure abt u guys since I'm juz a newbie.
But I think, IMHO, for any new photographers aspiring to shoot, the best is to start with 3 lens: The new EFS 10-22mm, the stock EFS 18-55mm and a EF 75-300. Wide angle, medium range and long range looks well covered in my ameuter opinion. At least dat's wad I think. Wad do u guys think? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Western SG
Posts: 1,507
|
the learning process of that lens 'point of view' is different for everyone. YOU must learn to visualize it then move on. Prime have the advantage here over zoom for beginners. Try reading the book "learning to see creatively" 2nd edition. The author had switched to a 'street zoom' compare to 50mm in his 1st edition. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
I've quite a few lenses but don't bring everything out at one go. Generally at most two lenses (24-85 or 35 and one tele zoom or prime).
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
I normally bring 1 out that's all. (In case everybody thinks espn owns the WHOLE of all the Nikon lenses, IT'S A LIE, I only own about 25%... that's all
, j/k). Go shoot with a 50mm and sometimes a zoom and sometimes a wide, it really makes a different in style.I remember I only had a 50mm to play with, then a zoom and finally a wide, took them out individually and learnt quite a bit in composition (although till now still nothing breakthrough). In short, you don't need a lot of lenses, you just need to know what you need. I do bring ALL out, but that's on very special occassions. |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: bukit batok
Posts: 4,212
|
24mm, 50mm, 100mm, if add 100mm+ 2xtc (cheap cheap $70 MC7) = 200mm. I have to walk alot more to explore all possible angle because i find changing lens abit troublesome.
not sure if you consider 3 lens + 1tc is too many. This is only my personally opinion. I used to shoot with zoom lens alot, but find that I tends to be very lazy due to the convenience of zooming in and out to frame the subject. As such, I find zoom lens does kill creativity to a certain extent.
__________________
photography makes one sees things from all angles. |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 651
|
I found that that for my shooting most of the time I need only 2 lenses. A moderate tele / normal and a wide-angle. I do have 4 primes (18mm, 28mm, 50mm and 100mm) but I only take 2 with me, maximum 3, and when revewing what I shoot I realise that I may have used only 1 lens, maybe 2 but rarely 3. So most of the time I take the 18mm and 50mm.. some times I will take the 100mm too. I have found that for what I shoot (I am assuming 35mm rather than digital or other formats): - 24~35mm can be covered with the 28mm - 40~70mm can be covered with the 50mm - 80~135mm can be covered with the 100mm Amusingly enough I have replicated the same list of lenses in my 645 set up, since I shoot the same things. I think the limited set-up helps me to understand "how" to take the shots since I know what the these lenses can do (i.e. how the world would look like through these lenses).. I guess with less choices I get more practise? One possibility that you may consider is to save yourself some money and go through your negs and see what you usually shoot and understand what lenses are usually needed for that. Then focus on buying/practising/pushing the limits of those lenses. In my mind, I think too much of anything is not healthy ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,578
|
I find it rather interesting to hear how zoom lens can 'kill' creativity. Being 'lazy' to zoom with the feet doesn't make a picture less good, and since the zoom lens allows the photographer to look through every possible framing within the zoom range, it's tough to argue that it 'kills' creativity. (denniskee, no offence, not attack you, but the point at hand. ) I hope we are not having the mindset of "prime wins zoom because less people know how to use it"... Very often I find myself visualising a picture, and yet unable to capture it, not because of the lens I use (zoom or prime), but the wrong moment, wrong angle or wrong light. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 322
|
I don't think having too many lens kills creativity....its getting too hung up over the specification and limitations of any particular lens that kills creativity.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|