Last edited by Cactus jACK; 2nd June 2011 at 12:30 AM.
Last edited by Cactus jACK; 2nd June 2011 at 12:29 AM.
Well done .. I'm impress at the sharpness and the ISO ... Good review Thanks
How will u compare is to gh2? On par or better?
wow, thanks for the review. Are those on yr flickr the original size? I hope not because the largest i saw was 1200 x 801.
Thanks for sharing, very helpful.
'Nothing to brag about, we are only as good as our next picture!'
If flexibility in capturing movies is important to you, the GH series may be more suited for your needs.
i'll upload the L jpegs of the sample pics over the weekend. thanks for the feedback.
all samples have been updated with original (unedited) L-size jpegs (4576 x 3056)... pls note that these full sized pics are 4-5MB in size.
Great job! A very cool review. Tempted me to get one too.
i'd assume that you're referring to the Lumix G 100-300mm F4-5.6 OIS (520g). while i have not tried the 100-300, i have tried it with the 45-200 (380g), ZF Planar-Marko 100/2 (680g), and the AF-D 200/4 Micro (1190g). admittedly, the latter 2 were on the tripod.Originally Posted by masalatikka
but you get the sense small size of the G2 doesn't nec match up well with large lenses. but that's not entirely true, holding the camera and lens about balance and control, if it is camera heavy - you hold the camera more firmly, if the lens is heavy - your balance would be on your front hand holding the lens, with the other to "guide" the camera. together with the Mega OIS offered by the 100-300, good holding technique and good breathing technique, shooting effective 200-600mm shouldn't be any issue.
however, this may not be so with lenses at this range without the OIS... good holding and breathing technique would become even more critical.