![]() |
|
|
#141 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: TheDaysMovie.com
Posts: 1,902
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#142 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Pole with Penguin
Posts: 5,185
|
http://www.usa.canon.com/templatedat...819_580ex.html
![]() BTW, the new CP-E3 uses 8 x AA batteries. CP-E2 uses 6 x AA Last edited by Wai; 23rd August 2004 at 03:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#143 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 25
|
Just thot this might be of interest to all of us:
see http://luminous-landscape.com/review...0d-part1.shtml ..excerpt: "As mentioned, the 20D has been reduced in size over the 10D and previous models in this line from Canon. Such shrinkage is not without its price though. It has been achieved by reducing the size of both the pentaprism and the instant return mirror. This makes the viewfinder a bit dimmer and a bit coarser than the previous generation. The coarseness isn't all that apparent indoors or under low contrast outdoor light conditions, but outdoors on a bright sunny day it's painfully obvious. (Canon claims that the coarseness to aid manual focusing, but that's just marketing BS; simply an attempt to turn a deficiency into a feature). Everything is a trade-off. Consumers want faster and better digital cameras and expect to pay less for it than they did at this time last year. Manufacturer's are squeezed to make a profit and be competitive in a ruthless and fast changing environment, where you're only as good as your latest product. Canon has obviously decided that smaller, lighter and less expensive to build is the success formula for the 20D, so long as the buyer still gets a bigger sensor, clean images and faster shooting speeds. Is the trade-off worthwhile in this case? I believe so. Unless one looks though the viewfinder of a 1Ds, and then one realizes the huge gap that exists in viewfinder brightness and size between models and between these price ranges. The reason that I believe that consumers will accept the situation is because in the end they are getting perceived value, and the somewhat darker and grainier viewfinder of the 20D is a price they'll likely be willing to pay." |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#144 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 23
|
wah... Heng man. I was about to get a 2nd hand 10D or D70 to replace my film based SLR. Something to get me started in the dSLR world.
Looks like I might as well wait. I can either buy the 20D or get a 2nd hand 10D which would be much cheaper.... |
|
|
|
|
#145 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 1,793
|
Cheers, |
|
|
|
|
|
#146 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Pole with Penguin
Posts: 5,185
|
if you keep shooting continuously without letting the flash rest, the heat is going to kill the bulb and that may not be the worst case yet. Since 20D is now faster (5fps) with a larger buffer, while 580ex and CP-E3 are capable of faster recycle time and higher power, it is very important to use the flash properly, esp for those who are new to SLR system, u have to make sure that the flash will not fire at full power when shooting at high speed continous. |
|
|
|
|
|
#147 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 151
|
Any idea if dust in CCD is still a problem for 20D?
If it is a nagging problem, why does Canon not learn from Olympus E1 and include an auto-clean feature?? Any reason??? |
|
|
|
|
#148 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: CCK
Posts: 1,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#149 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central
Posts: 136
|
Wat would likely to be the Sg RP for 20D? and if 550EX is compatible with it?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#150 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Pole with Penguin
Posts: 5,185
|
anyway, it is not something that serious to me, unless the dust particles are so big that u can them in your image. |
|
|
|
|
|
#151 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 1,793
|
Thanks wai! Just a curious question. Even with CP-E3 and the 580EX, there is still a lag time when the flash recharge. Wouldn't that be sufficient cooling time? Besides, with ETTL II, the flash normally don't fire at full power unless the situation warrants it. Cheers, |
|
|
|
|
|
#152 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Pole with Penguin
Posts: 5,185
|
for me, i will make sure i use direct flash with high ISO and -EV if i want to use flash + high speed continous mode. Even i dun shoot at high speed mode, my flash and battery pack can get rather hot after sometimes when i shoot event at night, imagine if i was shooting in high speed mode... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#154 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#155 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,492
|
as far as i can tell, my D60 had no problems with dust too.
|
|
|
|
|
#156 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Pole with Penguin
Posts: 5,185
|
Not for my 10D too, i have never cleaned my CMOS since the day i got it replaced a year ago. cos i see no point to clean it when i cannot see any black dots in my pix
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|