![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 131
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Punggol Park
Posts: 2,019
|
Java
thanks man!!! any url for the 17-85 ? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,611
|
17-85 with IS somemore... that would be my ultimate standard lens man!
![]()
__________________
Canon 40D|17-55 f/2.8 IS|100 f/2.8 Macro|135 f/2L|430ex|BG-E2 |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The 13th floor
Posts: 789
|
My dream lens too!!
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,611
|
![]()
__________________
Canon 40D|17-55 f/2.8 IS|100 f/2.8 Macro|135 f/2L|430ex|BG-E2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 131
|
And since it is EF-S, the price should be comparitively cheap.........
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 77
|
I'm gonna stand outside the camera shop and pick up one of these the moment they exit the truck!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,149
|
too bad not 2.8
nikon has a 17-55 2.8
__________________
www.tsangstudios.com |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 131
|
This EF-S cater for consumer market and not for pro market.... Should be more affordable to consumer then therefore no need a fast one.... but in the end ... some of these consumer market that got hook to Dslr will then poisoned by L lens and will convert to L .....
Canon seems very smart on this point..... especially putting EF-S lens as the introduction of Dslr .... As happen to me and might be to some of you... In the beginning there always 1 lens that you think that you are satisfy with.. In the end ... I end up with 3 L lens and bunch of Canon speciality lens (1.4 & macro).... Damn Canon.... |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Yishun Broadway KopiDiam
Posts: 704
|
what can i say beside Great!!!!
![]() ![]() Last edited by modenaslim; 18th August 2004 at 04:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,076
|
Equivilant 16mm on 300D/20D..... *drool*
If reasonably priced enough, could be quite an interesting lens to own. Indeed very wide. Exciting prospects. |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,149
|
__________________
www.tsangstudios.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 131
|
Well, Canon have 300D and 10D for consumer market..... And 1D & 1Ds for pro, therefore for wedding, these last two are the one for the wedding. I assume in early next year or end of next year, there will be an equivalent of EOS 3 for digital which is 10Mb 1.3 that cost around 3500-4000 SGD which will be an excellent camera for wedding.
Again 10D or 20D should not be considered as pro camera....... although the pricing still say otherwise (caomparing to film camera). |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: here
Posts: 3,752
|
i still stay on with my 10D and stay away from the ef-s lenses, cos i be getting a pro Digital-body sooner or later, gotten film body, already got the normal ef lenses, why kill yourself over this, like changing systems within systems. Yes i pray for a eos 3D in the near future, hold on to my 10D for now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Yishun , SG
Posts: 556
|
same same! but hopefully it's affordable ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,611
|
we have the same collection too heh... ![]()
__________________
Canon 40D|17-55 f/2.8 IS|100 f/2.8 Macro|135 f/2L|430ex|BG-E2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West side of S'pore
Posts: 5,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,253
|
Has anyone done any comparison on the difference in optical quality between the EF-S 18-55mm and say the 17-40L? Ok, I know this is comparing an L with a cheapo kit lens but how telling is the difference? I suppose the 10-22mm will have quality about the same as the 18-55mm?
If Canon makes a 10-22mm L, I'm sure lenses like the 17-40 will lose their popularity among digital users. Not wise move. Anyway, as someone said, full-fledge pros for weddings and such will use cams like the 1D MkII or 1Ds, not a 10D or 20D with the 1.6x FLM. Sometimes I also think it's a marketing ploy rather than a limitation in technology. For eg, I always dream of a 70-400mm f/4L IS lens that weighs 1kg or less and priced about $2K. That would be THE all purpose lens without the weight and bulk of the giant f/2.8L IS. I believe it's possible but doubt Canon will want to make it. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In my own world
Posts: 1,112
|
wha..this is a MUST buy! Hope it is below the $600 mark
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,552
|
If you want a 1 series, get it, 3D or whatever it will is not 1 series. P.S. I thought you're switching camp? ![]()
__________________
flickr |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|