![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Katong
Posts: 4,702
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Behind the viewfinder...
Posts: 5,954
|
Thailand?
hee hee.. anyway I think the 2nd pic is more "complete" compared to the 1st one... something about the shot makes it look more interesting and compelling than the initial ![]()
__________________
EYE-DEAS |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Katong
Posts: 4,702
|
Koh Samui.
Agreed the second one is better. The missing guy completes the circle. It was woefully underexposed (almost all black) and I was about to trash the negative. Thanks to PS and its dodging/burning tools, I managed to salvage it. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: East - West - East
Posts: 885
|
Hi ss,
i love this wild series alot but arent u afraid they might turn against you or something? ever asked permission from them? You said ya pics were underexposed and u saved them by burning and dodging? Correct me if i'm wrong but i tot dodging will only 'lighten' the pic and will not save the highlights and details? |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Katong
Posts: 4,702
|
Dodging the highlights is to bring out the bright areas, then you need to burn the shadows to bring back the dark areas. It's one of the best ways to selectively increase contrast in a picture. Yes, you do lose the details in the highlights and shadows, but the increased contrast allows you to make out the image better. Notice that the grain is definitely more, though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: East - West - East
Posts: 885
|
thanks for the info |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|