FPS is not an issue for me.....yet. Not into action or fast paced freeze motion photography yet.
*personally, I can hardly justify a reason for myself to upgrade when most/if not all the fault(s) comes from me and my lack of skills to push the camera + lens's capability to it's limit*
bring a mac and shoot tethered then you'll have a nice lcd.
Some PNS camera does really shoot very nice and sharp picture. My Lumix sometimes shoot day photos sharper and more beautiful than my 550D also. Some PNS as more expensive than the 450D or even 500D.
Sometimes it is due to external factors like lighting.Originally Posted by Pentium
I think you should focus on comparing the art of photography rather than buying a dslr to compare LCD screen. On the other hand I don't like lcd that are very bright and contrasty. Reason? They give a false impression that the picture I took is exposed properly etc but when you open up in computer I find that my pictures are under-exposed and dull.
I rather have a lcd that reflects what the actual photo looks like rather than I have to adjust my judgement to guess how the photo will look like on computer screen based on the lcd screen.
Personally I think making your photos look better through improved lcd screen is abit like delusion.
At the risk of jumping to conclusions here, i believe LCD screen is helpful to a certain extent. Example when client requests to preview photos on camera, what they see on camera LCD screen does matter. Of course you can explain to them that what they see is not what they get, but that first impressions is what is ingrained in them.
Thanks every1 for the reply, will do another deep thinking should I be changing,
Sometime it just the virus in this forum la (the BBB) haha