![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 943
|
Need Advice on above
Thinking of geting the Tamron SP 90mm Macro over the Nikon 105 Micro since the reviews i've read seems to be more in favour towards Tamron for quality n price over nikon which is better built n quality. But when i went to the Tamron webby, saw that they have a new lens - SP AF90MM F/2.8 DI Macro, the previous one is SP 90MM non DI. Anyone tried this? The website does't mention much about DI accept for 4 short paragraphs on marketing writeups. Should i go for DI or non DI ? Last edited by geoyip; 10th August 2004 at 03:57 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 943
|
Here's the links if u want to check it out:
DI: http://www.tamron.com/lenses/prod/90mm.asp Non DI: http://www.tamron.com/lenses/prod/m90mm.asp |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Central West
Posts: 1,913
|
Not many reviews of the Di version as it is quite new, but from the descriptions - it has a newer coating to reduce internal reflections, has an improved focusing ring. Sounds like an improvement over the non-Di.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 47
|
[quote=geoyip]Need Advice on above
Thinking of geting the Tamron SP 90mm Macro over the Nikon 105 Micro since the reviews i've read seems to be more in favour towards Tamron for quality n price over nikon which is better built n quality. Was just looking at the Tamron 90mm together with the nikkon 105mm this evening and happen to compared the 2,agreed with you that the price is really different and Tamron comes with a 3 year warranty I was told, Any way I was adviced to go for the Di version since I am Primarily a dslr user.However I must say the Di version seems very plastic and light, and because there wasn't the other non-di version around I am not sure if there is a difference in built quality between the 2.So best is to find a Shop that actually have both samples to compare the optics of the lens. hope that helps. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: my heart in san francisco
Posts: 2,234
|
was told that the DI version is more for DSLR users.
Used to own the non DI version - construction is plasticky but optics is really good. Light to carry around |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 943
|
Thanks ALL 4 the advice
Looks like I'll go 4 the DI version but will test it out first. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: West Coast of sunny Singapore
Posts: 1,470
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|