Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: D3100

  1. #1

    Default D3100

    IS D3100 a good enough DSLR for a beginner?

  2. #2

  3. #3

    Default Re: D3100

    definitely. some more cheaper

  4. #4

    Default

    Yes. Good enough

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Choa Chu Kang, Singapore, Sing
    Posts
    453

    Default Re: D3100

    more than enough
    D3100

  6. #6
    Moderator ortega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    23,686
    Blog Entries
    7

  7. #7

    Default Re: D3100

    Get the D90 if you have the budget.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Upper Bukit Timah
    Posts
    197

    Default Re: D3100

    Quote Originally Posted by Sgdevilzz View Post
    Get the D90 if you have the budget.
    You ought to explain to TS why you recommended the D90 instead of the D3100. Throwing up a model name alone doesn't really help.

  9. #9

    Default Re: D3100

    Quote Originally Posted by alcohollywood View Post
    You ought to explain to TS why you recommended the D90 instead of the D3100. Throwing up a model name alone doesn't really help.
    If he's smart enough he will research on his own. Can't always depend on others to give information.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Choa Chu Kang, Singapore, Sing
    Posts
    453

    Default Re: D3100

    Quote Originally Posted by Sgdevilzz View Post
    Get the D90 if you have the budget.
    if you have the "budget" might as well go for D7000
    D3100

  11. #11

    Default Re: D3100

    for Nikon D3100 with DX 16-85 VR lens and SB400
    NIKON D90 (2008-2010), D700 (2010-2012), D800 (2012-2014), DF (Dec 2013-Sep 2017)

  12. #12
    Moderator daredevil123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    lil red dot
    Posts
    21,627
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: D3100

    Quote Originally Posted by Sgdevilzz View Post
    Get the D90 if you have the budget.
    If have "budget" go for D3s FTW.

    That said, TS, D3100 is a good choice, enjoy your camera and welcome.

  13. #13

    Default Re: D3100

    I am using D3100. Yes it's a good camera for a beginner. It is light and easy to use. But I would recommend you to get D90 if you have the budget because D3100 can only AF with AFS lens and D90 can AF on both AFS and AFD lens, that means you got more choice of usable lens. IMHO.

  14. #14

    Default Re: D3100

    Other than able to auto-focus motor driven lenses, ergonomics is much better on a D90.
    Price is also quite good now.
    D3100 is equally capable to produce nice images at a lower budget.
    However, the grip maybe too small for some with bigger hands and it could be strenuous holding it for long hrs if u r mounting on a flash SB600 and above.
    U can try out the handling of the 2 cameras and assess them according to your budget.

  15. #15
    Moderator ortega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    23,686
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default Re: D3100

    the D3100 is a capable camera, spend some time instead of money and upgrade your skills first

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    3,786

    Default Re: D3100

    My recommendation for first time DSLR user:
    D3100 is a good start for beginners in photography who do not wish to carry a heavy setup anywhere in the near future and don't wish to get too serious into photography within 3 yrs timespan (2 minimum).
    D90 or D7000 are for serious beginners who wish to get into photography with a head start due to it's convenient and useful features such as bracketing and easy to reach settings on camera instead of in-menu.

    I would recommend D3100 to ladies who wants to try DSLR to replace their point and shoot. If you have prior photography experience and understand the basic 3 elements (Aperture, Shutter speed & ISO), go straight for D7000.
    For guys, I would recommend getting a 2nd hand D90 or a new local set D7000. D3100 is simply too small for guy's hand grip, imho...

  17. #17

    Default Re: D3100

    Quote Originally Posted by Cowseye View Post
    My recommendation for first time DSLR user:
    D3100 is a good start for beginners in photography who do not wish to carry a heavy setup anywhere in the near future and don't wish to get too serious into photography within 3 yrs timespan (2 minimum).
    D90 or D7000 are for serious beginners who wish to get into photography with a head start due to it's convenient and useful features such as bracketing and easy to reach settings on camera instead of in-menu.

    I would recommend D3100 to ladies who wants to try DSLR to replace their point and shoot. If you have prior photography experience and understand the basic 3 elements (Aperture, Shutter speed & ISO), go straight for D7000.
    For guys, I would recommend getting a 2nd hand D90 or a new local set D7000. D3100 is simply too small for guy's hand grip, imho...
    I have to concurr with what Cowseye said. I have been using the D3100 for over a month now and the grip really needs some time to getting used to it.

    The D3100 however, in my IMHO, is a great beginner DSLR in terms of it's capabilities, weight and affordability. The only downside i can think of the D3100 is it's inability to do bracketing shots, other than that it is great. I am not sure if all the other Nikon DSLRs are like that but i felt that the D3100 is particularly energy saving as well, i covered a Malay wedding yesterday and my battery did not even reduce a bar

    And well.. you shouldn't be comparing the D3100 to the D7000.. you have to compare apple to apple in order to be neutral and rationale in your decision
    [Chasing the Light]
    Canon EOS 1D MK III user =X

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    3,786

    Default Re: D3100

    I wouldn't agree with the battery lifespan though. My gf had used the camera a few days already and it mostly drains up the entire battery by the end of the day if she kept snapping. The specification state that the battery (nikon original enel-14) allows about 550 shots, and actual test (by my gf with a Tamron 18-270 VC and no flash) is about 1150 shots before it drains out. My D90 (enel-3e) can much longer than that. I assumed D7000's battery should perform similar or better than the one in D90.

  19. #19
    Senior Member jnet6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    not here often anymore
    Posts
    8,169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cowseye
    I wouldn't agree with the battery lifespan though. My gf had used the camera a few days already and it mostly drains up the entire battery by the end of the day if she kept snapping. The specification state that the battery (nikon original enel-14) allows about 550 shots, and actual test (by my gf with a Tamron 18-270 VC and no flash) is about 1150 shots before it drains out. My D90 (enel-3e) can much longer than that. I assumed D7000's battery should perform similar or better than the one in D90.
    Looks like the VC is consuming the battery faster... D90's battery is bigger and higher capacity then D3100, right?

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    3,786

    Default Re: D3100

    yeah definitely bigger capacity than the D3100 battery. It takes 2 times more than nikon's specification though, so i wouldn't say VC eat too much of juice from the battery.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •