Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Compare 70-200L with sigma 70-300

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    In my own world
    Posts
    1,314

    Default Compare 70-200L with sigma 70-300

    How much better is dat?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    新加坡
    Posts
    1,811

    Default

    i think i saw a L...
    "I want to have the best camera in the world and shoot XMMs."

  3. #3

    Default

    Mmm.. I think it would be resonable to compare the Sigma 70-200 EX with the Sigma 70-300 since the price is slightly more comparable (the sigma 70-200EX is about 1/2 the price of the canon 70-200L?).

    Anyway, you mean better in what way? Absolute mage quality? Price/performance ratio? Compactness/weight? Speed?

    Anyhoo.. OT here abit: I think the Sigma 70-200 F2.8 EX HSM is a very good substitute for the Canon 70-200L F2.8 if you don't have the $$$ to plunk down. Just my $0.0002.

  4. #4

    Default

    Just saw in Aug issue of Photography Monthly that Nikon's 80-200mm/f2.8 and Sigma's 70-200mm/f2.8 fared better than Canon's 70-200mm/f2.8L IS.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    In my own world
    Posts
    1,314

    Default

    probably I should as in more details....

    I'm actually looking into several aspects..like sharpness contrast and compatbility with TC. price wise we all know the difference lah I'm more concern with the optical quality. Any1 here can say it loud that sigma 70-200 2.8 is sharper than the L lens?

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    CCK
    Posts
    1,051

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rainman
    probably I should as in more details....

    I'm actually looking into several aspects..like sharpness contrast and compatbility with TC. price wise we all know the difference lah I'm more concern with the optical quality. Any1 here can say it loud that sigma 70-200 2.8 is sharper than the L lens?
    Heh Heh! Obviously won't slam my own L-lens (70-200/2.8IS), but I will say that I had owned the Sigma 70-200/2.8, and would absolutely NOT have traded it in if not for the IS. It was a fabulous lens, sharp, fast focussing, well built, great contrast and colour. If you don't need IS, and can find a good copy (heard that there are some lemons out there), it is great value for money and one of the BEST lenses available for the EF mount, regardless of price.

  7. #7

    Default

    Hmm...you're comparing a $350 lens with another that costs almost 10 times as much...and no prize for guessing which one is which...

    The 70-300mm Sigma is a poor man's telephoto zoom lens. If you want to compare it should be the 70-300mm Sigma with the 75-300mm Canon...

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    In my own world
    Posts
    1,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ah Pao
    Hmm...you're comparing a $350 lens with another that costs almost 10 times as much...and no prize for guessing which one is which...

    The 70-300mm Sigma is a poor man's telephoto zoom lens. If you want to compare it should be the 70-300mm Sigma with the 75-300mm Canon...

    yah lah...i mean since u say the price is 10 times diff..then I should expect 10 times difference in the quality loh....

    probably I should make a trip to the camera shop and justify for myself...

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Singapore (SengKang)
    Posts
    2,789

    Default

    Get a prime. You will be blown away by its sharpness
    -Express yourself not in words-
    http://www.majere2sg.com

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by majere2sg
    Get a prime. You will be blown away by its sharpness
    Oh... Like the 135 f/2L???

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    In my own world
    Posts
    1,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by majere2sg
    Get a prime. You will be blown away by its sharpness

    Yah prime is good...but lazy man like me dun like to carry too many lenses...keke

    anyone know how much is the latest 28-300 L IS?
    if less than 2 k can consider of cos the quality must be good also lah since it is a L lens

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Singapore (SengKang)
    Posts
    2,789

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rainman
    anyone know how much is the latest 28-300 L IS?
    if less than 2 k can consider of cos the quality must be good also lah since it is a L lens
    Should be around S$4k++
    -Express yourself not in words-
    http://www.majere2sg.com

  13. #13

    Default

    S$4600+ from CP if i remember correctly. Really insane price.. And it's not even fast-> F3.5-5.6?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •