ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Usergroup Discussions > Underwater Photography

Underwater Photography All things nautically & photographically related. Dive in!!


 
Thread Tools
Old 13th July 2004   #1
beivied
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East, Singapore
Posts: 4,213
Default Manual White Balance

Hi guys.. i tried manual white balance at Kuantan/Tioman two weeks ago .. results may not be too favourable, but guess i can show the photos to you guys.. and the different results that i get ...


using manual white balance


using cloudy white balance

NOTE: the vis was really, really bad... probably 5m at most. only the white balance was changed.
beivied is offline  
Old 13th July 2004   #2
beivied
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East, Singapore
Posts: 4,213
Default

beivied is offline  
Old 13th July 2004   #3
beivied
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East, Singapore
Posts: 4,213
Default





ithink my shutter speed is too slow, all a little blurry ..
beivied is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 13th July 2004   #4
clive
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,573
Lightbulb

cloudy WB is er...the green looks too fakeish? like nightvision like that but the manual WB makes the pic look really really realistic its like..wow..so thsi is how underwater looks like =)
clive is offline  
Old 13th July 2004   #5
beivied
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East, Singapore
Posts: 4,213
Default

hahha.. by the way, no PS work done on these photos at all.. the actual visibility of the wreck that day was more like the greenish photo.. except that it is a tad too green.. but to do justice to the manual white balance, and also to let you guys have a better feel of the actual vis and how the wreck looked like in terms of colour to the naked (ok, masked) eyes, it is more towards the like of the greenish photo.

Last edited by beivied; 13th July 2004 at 12:41 AM.
beivied is offline  
Old 13th July 2004   #6
clive
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,573
Default

so that means the "manual WB version" is what we can expect to actually see underwater when the visibility is much clearer?
clive is offline  
Old 15th July 2004   #7
lanxx
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 897
Default

But I find manual WB too troublesome..
lanxx is offline  
Old 15th July 2004   #8
kthan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,318
Default

if u shoot RAW, there is no need of manual WB underwater. Agree that it is too troublesome, having to bring something white or grey u/w. Also u have to do a manual W/B on different depths.

Shooting RAW, the WB can be adjusted on the PC.

Eric
kthan is offline  
Old 15th July 2004   #9
siaoon
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 738
Default

Well, think initial few try out will be troublesome..
but after a few more tries and developing a pattern of doing it..
its shld be easy and comfortable liao..
well.. of coz.. its consider more things to do.. comparing to those w strobes...

however personally its juz another alternative for ppl w/o strobes..
or u dun hav a x drive or a bigbig storage card for yr camera to use raw..

hmm..
maybe puffy can share more with us as i think she tried this method quite frequently..

hmmm beivied.. does c5050 got bracketing function..??? juz think u need to -1/3 or 2/3 stops.. or use bracketing loh..

hee.. well.. think its juz another way to fully utilising yr camera ability..
siaoon is offline  
Old 15th July 2004   #10
beivied
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East, Singapore
Posts: 4,213
Default

i use my writing slate which i always bring down anyway. intially i do find it troublesome but after a while it becomes pretty ok.

you can bring colours to your photos be it wide angle or macro, using strobes, ambient lighting manual or not manual white balance, raw function or just photoshop. but i think the same effects cannot be replicated. or my skills not there la, i feel that there will be a difference in effect for the different methods. in fact, i think with strobes is a hassle as well. a lot more to think in terms of strobe placement compare to "take slate up, aim, shoot, shoot at subject again".

i would try RAW the next time though (dunno when i can bring camera down again, sigh).

anyone wanna sell their red filter???

eh ... maybe can help comment on the pics? Pufferfishy?

hmm... bracketing... you take my camera and yan jiu lo, haha. no it doesnt. as far as i know la. waisj? lovells?

Last edited by beivied; 15th July 2004 at 12:26 PM.
beivied is offline  
Old 15th July 2004   #11
scotsman
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Above Land
Posts: 92
Default

These are some of my attempts with manual white balance using my slate board. Problem is that u need to keep resetting it at different depths..







scotsman is offline  
Old 15th July 2004   #12
scotsman
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Above Land
Posts: 92
Default

Think I read some where that is much better to use a Red filter to add color and then set ur white balance manually. That way, the red is already there rather than having the camera artifically create it.
scotsman is offline  
Old 15th July 2004   #13
alv777
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 105
Default

wow! I'm amaze what manual wb can show.
alv777 is offline  
Old 15th July 2004   #14
alv777
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by beivied
i use my writing slate which i always bring down anyway. intially i do find it troublesome but after a while it becomes pretty ok.
how frequent do you ahve to readjust the w/b again? is it like every 5m or something?
alv777 is offline  
Old 15th July 2004   #15
beivied
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East, Singapore
Posts: 4,213
Default

scotsman your pics are better than mine

alv, its best if you can reset it every shot, haha. but i do it agar like every 3 or 2 m.
beivied is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 09:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.10244 seconds with 7 queries