Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 29

Thread: Recommendations for zoom lens

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Bishan
    Posts
    307

    Default Recommendations for zoom lens

    Will a 28-200mm zoom lens surfice, or will a 28-300mm lens be a better option? What's the recommended brands/models to get? How much does it costs? I'm using a Canon EOS.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    6,405

    Default Re: Recommendations for zoom lens

    Originally posted by currahee
    Will a 28-200mm zoom lens surfice, or will a 28-300mm lens be a better option? What's the recommended brands/models to get? How much does it costs? I'm using a Canon EOS.
    Both are just as crap. But if you want to buy one, get the newer Tamron 28-200 with a 62mm lens thread. It's the XR II version I believe, which is supposedly better.

    Also consider the original Canon EF 28-105 or 28-135 IS USM

    Regards
    CK

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Bishan
    Posts
    307

    Default

    why are they crap? or is it better to get a 80-300mm lens? n a seperate 24-70 lens?

    what's the price of the tamron u mentioned?

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Bishan
    Posts
    307

    Default

    what abt a 28-300mm price?

  5. #5

    Default

    err ... if you are talking abt Canon EF 28-200mm USM lens , it is not a crappy lens ... I have seen some good quality shots < 200mm focal length taken by this lens at dpreview forum .. however the price is not worth for getting it ... cost abt $800++

    for this price , you can get a better lens like 75-300mm USM IS ...
    See my Photo Gallery at the Clubsnap

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Bishan
    Posts
    307

    Default

    perhaps not a Canon lens since it's more expensive...no budget for it

    think a 3rd party lens will do

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    6,405

    Default

    Originally posted by currahee
    perhaps not a Canon lens since it's more expensive...no budget for it

    think a 3rd party lens will do
    What's your budget? Whenever possible, try to avoid the 28-200 and 28-300 superzooms, particularly if they are not the original. If you have no choice, then like I said, get the Tamron. As far as I have seen, the Tamron 28-300 is worse than the 28-200, and it has a smaller maximum aperture as well.

    Regards
    CK

  8. #8

    Default

    I have tried the 28-300mm Sigma. It is so very dark at the 300mm end, and with zoom creep problem. Definitely not a lens that I will spend my money on...
    DR KOH KHO KING

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Bishan
    Posts
    307

    Default

    think max is ard $400 lor...but if can get cheaper the best lor...
    wats the problem with the 300mm superzoom? so best is only to get a 28-200mm is it? what do u all suggest suppose i want to take a zoom shot?

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Bishan
    Posts
    307

    Default

    is a teleconverter a good alternative?

  11. #11

    Default

    I think you'll have to ask yourself why do you want a 300mm in the first place. After you've convinced yourself that you really need that 300mm, then consider the options. In general, zoom lens that goes to 300mm will not give good results when they are being blown up to sizes like 8R. There are of course exceptions.

    That aside, I think the Canon 75-300 cost like $400. Not the best, but will get the job done. I don't think there are other alternatives in the Canon lineup, apart from the 100-300 USMs f/4-5.6 and the older 100-300L f/5.6. But these costs much more.

    Tamron has a 75-300 that cost under $400 as well.

    About teleconverters, be aware that Canon bodies lose AF if your biggest aperture goes beyond 5.6 (I think).

    Regards,
    Juay Kwang

  12. #12

    Default

    Originally posted by currahee
    think max is ard $400 lor...but if can get cheaper the best lor...
    wats the problem with the 300mm superzoom? so best is only to get a 28-200mm is it? what do u all suggest suppose i want to take a zoom shot?
    Forget about the 28-300mm, as your budget is not enough. Both Sigma and Tamron is more than S$400.
    DR KOH KHO KING

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    6,405

    Default

    Originally posted by currahee
    think max is ard $400 lor...but if can get cheaper the best lor...
    wats the problem with the 300mm superzoom? so best is only to get a 28-200mm is it? what do u all suggest suppose i want to take a zoom shot?
    Problem with most superzooms is the image quality. The longer the range, the worse it gets. And the slower the lens becomes. What are the lenses that you currently have? Or do you have none?

    Regards
    CK

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Bishan
    Posts
    307

    Default

    thanx for all the info...i currently have a 28-80mm zoom...so sometimes cannot take close-up shots of buildings etc...so tot of looking for a 200mm or 300mm zoom lens.

    why is it that there's image quality problems for the high zoom? espeacially for blown up? what about those extender tube kind of zoom lens (100-300mm)?

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Bishan
    Posts
    307

    Default

    so will a teleconverter helps?

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    South Pole with Penguin
    Posts
    5,270

    Default Re: Re: Recommendations for zoom lens

    Originally posted by ckiang

    Also consider the original Canon EF 28-105 or 28-135 IS USM
    how abt Canon 28-105 f3.5-4.5 vs Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4 ??

    will u choose Sigma over Canon for its bigger aperture?

    how's their AF speed and handling?

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    6,405

    Default Re: Re: Re: Recommendations for zoom lens

    Originally posted by kamwai


    how abt Canon 28-105 f3.5-4.5 vs Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4 ??

    will u choose Sigma over Canon for its bigger aperture?

    how's their AF speed and handling?
    Tough question. This is something you'll have to try out for yourself. I have a feeling the Canon might be better, though slower.

    Regards
    CK

  18. #18
    Moderator ziploc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Snoopyland
    Posts
    4,577

    Default

    Originally posted by currahee
    so will a teleconverter helps?
    Hi currahee,

    I've not tried it, but I suspect a good standard zoom plus a good TC will give better image then a superzoom. My idea travel lens: a light consumer AFD 28-105/3.5-4.5 plus a 2x Tamron/Kenko TC (I'm a nikon user).

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Bishan
    Posts
    307

    Default

    Originally posted by ziploc


    Hi currahee,

    I've not tried it, but I suspect a good standard zoom plus a good TC will give better image then a superzoom. My idea travel lens: a light consumer AFD 28-105/3.5-4.5 plus a 2x Tamron/Kenko TC (I'm a nikon user).
    how much for a 28-135 zoom? and the 2x teleconverter?

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Bishan
    Posts
    307

    Default Re: Re: Re: Recommendations for zoom lens

    Originally posted by kamwai


    how abt Canon 28-105 f3.5-4.5 vs Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4 ??

    will u choose Sigma over Canon for its bigger aperture?

    how's their AF speed and handling?
    are sigma lens good?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •