![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 552
|
Hi guys, i intend to get 2 primes mainly for indoor shots (lowlight)..
I hate using flash because i want to capture the ambient lighting (usually warm), and the white light from the flash screws it up... however, i feel that 50mm is usually good for a portrait, but sometimes when i take of 2 ppl etc, i want a larger crop... im definitlely getting the 50/1.8, what do u think is another prime i shd get? is 35mm ok, or is it too similar to the 50mm? what abt 28? also, how much more light is there in a 2.8vs2.0vs1.8? does each stop effectively allow me to halve my exposure time (shutter speed)? I really hate pumping up the ISO to unreasonable amts just to be able to hand hold it.. BTW im using d70, so must take into accnt the 1.5x. thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,078
|
Yes, each stop allows you to halve your shutter speed. 2.8 to 2.0 is one stop, 2.0 to 1.8 is 1/3 stop.
A 35mm on 1.5x crop gives you something *similar* to a 50mm normal lens, your 50mm becomes something *similar* to a 75mm lens. The 28 becomes a very average 42mm. I'd say 35 is too close, but then it really depends on your shooting style. If you want a wide angle you really need to stretch to a 24mm and below. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,610
|
Not sure what you are describing here. But personally I find that a 50mm*1.5FOV can handle both individual portraits and up to 2-3 pple if you just step back a little.
You don't really need another lens if its just 2-3persons. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,591
|
I agree, a 50mm f/1.8 can do nice portraits... just did a family portrait in which there were like 10 of us -no problem, just back up about 10 feet or so
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 103
|
thomaschan, if I were you with only a choice of 2 lenses, I'll get the 24mm (20mm if you've the budget) and 50mm. These'll cover at least most of the subjects.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 813
|
D70's grain at high ISOs is minimal. i dont really see a problem with increasing the iso
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 979
|
if u are into primes... get the following based on your photography needs
The std 50mm... the std The wide 20mm The macro 105mm Portraiture either 85 or 105
__________________
www.pbase.com/sebastiansong |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 552
|
thanks a billion for the advice guys... i might consider getting the 35mm prime..
how about tokina/tamron/sigma primes? any of those good? after seeing how much sharper my 50mm prime is, i find that im using my kit lens less and less! |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 972
|
I'd get the 20mm if I were you. It is a very versatile lens for travel/everyday photography. In my opinion, 35mm is a 'nowhere here nowhere there' focal length.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 972
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: West Coast of sunny Singapore
Posts: 1,470
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: www.maverickatwork.com
Posts: 6,768
|
perhaps u wanna get a 105mm prime....for head and body shots..
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 88
|
If you are at really extreme low light conditions, then a shorter focal length will reduce your minimum shutter speed based on the 1/focal length rule. I would choose a 35mm f/2D or 28mm f/1.4D, based on your budget. Shoot at full resolution and RAW if possible. If you have a hand held meter or don't mind guessing, you can go for the manual focus 35mm f/1.4 or 28mm f/2 for much cheaper prices.
Shoot half body for headshots and by cropping down, this will still let you use 1/15 or 1/30 at 28mm. As long as your lens is sharp enough (as most primes are) and the subject is big enough, you can get a good balance between crop limits and camera shake at long shutter speeds. I have the 85mm f/2 and 105mm f/2.5 lenses, and for low light, they are just limited by the faster shutter speeds that they require. Unless you are using a tripod/monopod, then stick to 50mm and shorter. Aaron Last edited by aaronng; 6th July 2004 at 08:47 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore, Central
Posts: 626
|
i love primes myself (love my 50mm!) and the obvious third prime for me would be the 105 Micro which does double duty as a macro lens as well and also uses 52mm filters. to add another point, you might not shoot with these lenses wide open since to my eyes the images come out a bit "soft". also remember to maintain proper shutter speeds ~1/60-1/125 when shooting people indoors with typical indoor lighting. Last edited by buddy; 6th July 2004 at 09:45 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Western side of Singapore
Posts: 1,163
|
I second sebastionsong's recommendation of a 20, 50 and the 105 Micro. It's a very versatile and light weight kit good for handling most situations you can throw at it. An alternative might be 20, 35, 85 if you are more into portraits
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|