EOS 300 or EOS 30?

emphosis · 3rd July 2004

What's the diff between this 2 cams. Or any good recommendation on SLR cams? I would like to know more. What's the specs for and stuff.. I'm still a beginner in SLR cams. And mind to talk more about flash, filters, and lens? Thanks

zekai · 3rd July 2004

i recommend, to read canon website

rainman · 3rd July 2004

get the eos30....
consider intermediate level beginner, equivalent canon 10d but is flim slr.
Saw polo_pro selling..go get it

andi1704 · 3rd July 2004

www.canon.com

JermsDayOut · 3rd July 2004

the metering for the eos30/33 series has been reputed to be very accurate in most light conditions. so you can trust the camera more. however, this only serves to aid the photographer in shooting. doesn't discount the fact that the photographer still has to know what sort of metering modes to used and what he has to use in his composition to meter on.

the eos30/33 has also been touted as a very reliable camera with a sturdy body. although its a prosumer SLR, this shouldn't deter you from handling this camera if you're a newbie, cos if you've got the passion to learn and practice, you will learn things fast and you will feel that your eos 300 cannot keep up.

just my thoughts. hope i dun offend the experts

d7t3 · 3rd July 2004

specifications can be found on www.canon.com.sg

but you need to get a feel of the cameras to know how they handle, and their ergonomics.

in my opinion the 300 is light but has a real kick: its mirror slap can really be felt and heard, which isn't good. i also think the grip is too small for comfort.

i would get the 30 or 33 as they are much more solidly built, fit better in my hands and have better features though they are not expensive.

i would even say, consider investing in the 30/33, or go for the 66 (i just don't like the 300's feel). but that's MY opinion only.

EiRiK · 3rd July 2004

i use the eos30 myself and i must say that it is a very reliable camera... both in terms of picture quality and build. its focusing is fast too.
but if u ask me, i would recommend a newbie to get a dslr like 300d if u can afford it now... coz u will learn faster as u can afford to keep trying and trying till you get the exposure u want. for film u have to wait for a day to have the pics developed.
just my HO...

polo_pro10 · 3rd July 2004

Originally Posted by EiRiK

i use the eos30 myself and i must say that it is a very reliable camera... both in terms of picture quality and build. its focusing is fast too.
but if u ask me, i would recommend a newbie to get a dslr like 300d if u can afford it now... coz u will learn faster as u can afford to keep trying and trying till you get the exposure u want. for film u have to wait for a day to have the pics developed.
just my HO...

I second that.

clive · 3rd July 2004

take the eos 30

ptwong · 3rd July 2004

sorry for OT but how is the EOS 50 compared to the EOS 30? thinking of getting either one

NiVleK · 4th July 2004

Specs wise, I think that 50 is closely similar to 30 since 30 is the later generation of 50. Btw, 50 is out of production and it costs $500+ brand new. For that price, I would rather get a mint condition EOS 30. :P

(unless you can find a good bargain for a 2nd hand EOS 50)

OzOn3 · 4th July 2004

the EOS 300 is largely a consumer camera.. You dun get many metering modes.. I can't really remember what modes are available..

You get a host of functions in EOS 30.. Like the 13 custom functions.. hmm, spot metering.. FEL i think.. FEC i think..

Also, EOS 300 can't do second curtain sync, if you want to..

Build wise, EOS 30 is definately more sturdier(if there's such a word) than the EOS 300. The EOS 300 gives me a very plasticky feel.

Window slap for EOS 300 is rather loud. If you have fantasies of being international spies who uses cameras with loud window slaps, get the 300

Egronomics wise, i love me EOS 30

EOS 50 and 30's specs are very similar.. The thing is EOS 50 is older, and the design.. well, i dun like. heh.. But i read some reviews, and it stated that EOS 50 is better then eos 30.. heh.

btw, i think helbreath was selling his eos 50.. dunno sold already not.. heh

emphosis · 4th July 2004

Originally Posted by EiRiK

i use the eos30 myself and i must say that it is a very reliable camera... both in terms of picture quality and build. its focusing is fast too.
but if u ask me, i would recommend a newbie to get a dslr like 300d if u can afford it now... coz u will learn faster as u can afford to keep trying and trying till you get the exposure u want. for film u have to wait for a day to have the pics developed.
just my HO...

I'm a photography student. I need a SLR cam for my school usage. So DSLR, would be a later part. How much is EOS 30/33. and what's the diff between EOS 30 and 33?

emphosis · 4th July 2004

seriously, i'm a camera idiot. What's the snap you guys talking? and what's the ... err FEC? or.. EFC? err I don't really get the hand of it. Probably you guys could give me some examples or something? And the price of EOS 30 and 300, is it a huge difference? and what's the diff between eos 30 and 33. Thanks thanks, tell me more pls

whoelse · 4th July 2004

Nah-> http://www.photonotes.org/reviews/5-50-30/
30 uses same AF as 300, where 50 has a better AF with infra assist.
Metal top, meter is accurate enuf I nv bother to compensate for hotspot or nitescene.
Battery prob. seem to be the old Sanyo batt. that is shorter, nowaday size are according to spec. no issue.
Batt. door does feel filmsy, but nv heard of 1 had a broken door so far, mine is ard 10yrs still doing strong.

Cheaper price on used market that shd give you spare $ to buy many accessaries.

30V shd be a good choice I believe although I nv handle 1 bf.

misato · 4th July 2004

I have been using EOS 300 for quite a while. While people complain of its plastic body and ugly silver finish, the camera is auctally a very good performer.

Plain shooting wise, it is has many of the same features found in the more expensive EOS 30 inside. Its weight, size is its best asset.

However, among many of its disadvantage people listed, from my point of view, the EOS 300 lag the most in its flash handling capability. Its X-sync is only 90 and dont have fp/highspeed X-sync. Which limits its ability to capture actions when equipped with a flash unit like EZ/EX 550.

Einstein · 4th July 2004

Hi.

In my view get the EOS 33v. It serves without the eye control which is useless. Its just another gimmick. Save ur money or accesories. EOS 30v sells about 150 more then EOS 33v, all functions are the same except the eye control, brand new. Here's the catch, EOS 33v isnt available in most shop in sg for now, I went around asking and you have to pre-order it first.

Ah Pao · 5th July 2004

My take: depends on your budget.
Opinions based on personal experience with all 3 cameras.

If you really have a tight budget then go for the EOS 300. Despite what others said, the EOS 300 is a full-featured camera enough for a beginner. Might as well save the money for lenses. Unless you are using the camera to take sports or need to subject it to rough usage, the EOS 300 is sturdy enough.

The EOS 30 gives better control compared to the EOS 300, is more solidly built, and gives a more "professional" feeling. It's bigger and heavier too. If you feel you are going to take photography as a long-term hobby/interest, then it's more justified getting an EOS 30 over the EOS 300.

The EOS 50...hmm...ain't have faster AF than the EOS 300 (it's in fact more or less the same speed), ain't more slient (the mirror slaps as loud), but it's a good alternative to the EOS 30 for the best bang for the buck.

Ah Pao · 5th July 2004

Originally Posted by misato

However, among many of its disadvantage people listed, from my point of view, the EOS 300 lag the most in its flash handling capability. Its X-sync is only 90 and dont have fp/highspeed X-sync. Which limits its ability to capture actions when equipped with a flash unit like EZ/EX 550.

EX550, EX420 and Sigma 500DG will allow FP sync on the EOS 300.

emphosis · 5th July 2004

oh icic... Then would anyone recommend to get a 2nd hand camera? I've got someone who asked me if I'm interested in his EOS 30 which cost $490.

3rd July 2004	#1
emphosis Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 78	EOS 300 or EOS 30? What's the diff between this 2 cams. Or any good recommendation on SLR cams? I would like to know more. What's the specs for and stuff.. I'm still a beginner in SLR cams. And mind to talk more about flash, filters, and lens? Thanks

3rd July 2004	#2
zekai Senior Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: Singapore Posts: 1,737	i recommend, to read canon website __________________ http://alextan.net

3rd July 2004	#7
EiRiK Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: North Posts: 853	i use the eos30 myself and i must say that it is a very reliable camera... both in terms of picture quality and build. its focusing is fast too. but if u ask me, i would recommend a newbie to get a dslr like 300d if u can afford it now... coz u will learn faster as u can afford to keep trying and trying till you get the exposure u want. for film u have to wait for a day to have the pics developed. just my HO... __________________ web \| blog \| facebook

4th July 2004	#16
misato Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: SG Posts: 310	I have been using EOS 300 for quite a while. While people complain of its plastic body and ugly silver finish, the camera is auctally a very good performer. Plain shooting wise, it is has many of the same features found in the more expensive EOS 30 inside. Its weight, size is its best asset. However, among many of its disadvantage people listed, from my point of view, the EOS 300 lag the most in its flash handling capability. Its X-sync is only 90 and dont have fp/highspeed X-sync. Which limits its ability to capture actions when equipped with a flash unit like EZ/EX 550. Last edited by misato; 4th July 2004 at 09:11 AM.

5th July 2004	#18
Ah Pao Member Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Singapore Posts: 1,578	My take: depends on your budget. Opinions based on personal experience with all 3 cameras. If you really have a tight budget then go for the EOS 300. Despite what others said, the EOS 300 is a full-featured camera enough for a beginner. Might as well save the money for lenses. Unless you are using the camera to take sports or need to subject it to rough usage, the EOS 300 is sturdy enough. The EOS 30 gives better control compared to the EOS 300, is more solidly built, and gives a more "professional" feeling. It's bigger and heavier too. If you feel you are going to take photography as a long-term hobby/interest, then it's more justified getting an EOS 30 over the EOS 300. The EOS 50...hmm...ain't have faster AF than the EOS 300 (it's in fact more or less the same speed), ain't more slient (the mirror slaps as loud), but it's a good alternative to the EOS 30 for the best bang for the buck. Last edited by Ah Pao; 5th July 2004 at 06:24 PM.

3rd July 2004	#3
rainman Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: In my own world Posts: 1,112	get the eos30.... consider intermediate level beginner, equivalent canon 10d but is flim slr. Saw polo_pro selling..go get it

3rd July 2004	#4
andi1704 Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 540	www.canon.com

3rd July 2004	#5
JermsDayOut Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 259	the metering for the eos30/33 series has been reputed to be very accurate in most light conditions. so you can trust the camera more. however, this only serves to aid the photographer in shooting. doesn't discount the fact that the photographer still has to know what sort of metering modes to used and what he has to use in his composition to meter on. the eos30/33 has also been touted as a very reliable camera with a sturdy body. although its a prosumer SLR, this shouldn't deter you from handling this camera if you're a newbie, cos if you've got the passion to learn and practice, you will learn things fast and you will feel that your eos 300 cannot keep up. just my thoughts. hope i dun offend the experts

3rd July 2004	#6
d7t3 Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: In the Shepherd's hands Posts: 676	specifications can be found on www.canon.com.sg but you need to get a feel of the cameras to know how they handle, and their ergonomics. in my opinion the 300 is light but has a real kick: its mirror slap can really be felt and heard, which isn't good. i also think the grip is too small for comfort. i would get the 30 or 33 as they are much more solidly built, fit better in my hands and have better features though they are not expensive. i would even say, consider investing in the 30/33, or go for the 66 (i just don't like the 300's feel). but that's MY opinion only.

3rd July 2004	#9
clive Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 2,573	take the eos 30

3rd July 2004	#10
ptwong Member Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Yishun Posts: 489	sorry for OT but how is the EOS 50 compared to the EOS 30? thinking of getting either one

4th July 2004	#11
NiVleK Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: Potong Pasir Posts: 696	Specs wise, I think that 50 is closely similar to 30 since 30 is the later generation of 50. Btw, 50 is out of production and it costs $500+ brand new. For that price, I would rather get a mint condition EOS 30. :P (unless you can find a good bargain for a 2nd hand EOS 50)

4th July 2004	#12
OzOn3 Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Singapore Posts: 1,103	the EOS 300 is largely a consumer camera.. You dun get many metering modes.. I can't really remember what modes are available.. You get a host of functions in EOS 30.. Like the 13 custom functions.. hmm, spot metering.. FEL i think.. FEC i think.. Also, EOS 300 can't do second curtain sync, if you want to.. Build wise, EOS 30 is definately more sturdier(if there's such a word) than the EOS 300. The EOS 300 gives me a very plasticky feel. Window slap for EOS 300 is rather loud. If you have fantasies of being international spies who uses cameras with loud window slaps, get the 300 Egronomics wise, i love me EOS 30 EOS 50 and 30's specs are very similar.. The thing is EOS 50 is older, and the design.. well, i dun like. heh.. But i read some reviews, and it stated that EOS 50 is better then eos 30.. heh. btw, i think helbreath was selling his eos 50.. dunno sold already not.. heh

4th July 2004	#15
whoelse Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 1,227	Nah-> http://www.photonotes.org/reviews/5-50-30/ 30 uses same AF as 300, where 50 has a better AF with infra assist. Metal top, meter is accurate enuf I nv bother to compensate for hotspot or nitescene. Battery prob. seem to be the old Sanyo batt. that is shorter, nowaday size are according to spec. no issue. Batt. door does feel filmsy, but nv heard of 1 had a broken door so far, mine is ard 10yrs still doing strong. Cheaper price on used market that shd give you spare $ to buy many accessaries. 30V shd be a good choice I believe although I nv handle 1 bf.

4th July 2004	#17
Einstein Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 397	Hi. In my view get the EOS 33v. It serves without the eye control which is useless. Its just another gimmick. Save ur money or accesories. EOS 30v sells about 150 more then EOS 33v, all functions are the same except the eye control, brand new. Here's the catch, EOS 33v isnt available in most shop in sg for now, I went around asking and you have to pre-order it first.