ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Nikon

Nikon At the heart of the image


 
Thread Tools
Old 1st July 2004   #1
Ajit
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 28
Default Filter for D70 kit lens

Hi,

If I want to buy a filter just to protect the "AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED " lens, shall I go for a UV filter or Skylight one. Which will have the least impact on the picture, f stops etc......

Thanks.
Ajit is offline  
Old 1st July 2004   #2
Dennis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,862
Default

I would have the UV ones.


Originally Posted by Ajit
Hi,

If I want to buy a filter just to protect the "AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED " lens, shall I go for a UV filter or Skylight one. Which will have the least impact on the picture, f stops etc......

Thanks.
Dennis is offline  
Old 1st July 2004   #3
deadpixel
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: East
Posts: 1,252
Default

For protection, just go with either the UV or an HMC.

UV, Skylight and HMC filters are clear so do not affect the f-stop. Skylight filters have a slight pink cast to them and will affect the color of your shots.

What you need to be concerned about isn't the impact on the f-stops but the overall quality of your images and vignetting if you buy cheap filters.

Originally Posted by Ajit
Hi,

If I want to buy a filter just to protect the "AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED " lens, shall I go for a UV filter or Skylight one. Which will have the least impact on the picture, f stops etc......

Thanks.
deadpixel is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 1st July 2004   #4
ndroo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: www.fuzzyeyeballs.com
Posts: 6,717
Default

Originally Posted by deadpixel
For protection, just go with either the UV or an HMC.

UV, Skylight and HMC filters are clear so do not affect the f-stop. Skylight filters have a slight pink cast to them and will affect the color of your shots.

What you need to be concerned about isn't the impact on the f-stops but the overall quality of your images and vignetting if you buy cheap filters.
HMC filter? If I am not wrong, HMC is just a different grading (better grade) for Hoya filters rite?
ndroo is offline  
Old 1st July 2004   #5
quekky
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: www.irphotography.com
Posts: 1,377
Default

just go for the B+W MRC, only cost $60+ and u wun regret it
quekky is offline  
Old 1st July 2004   #6
deadpixel
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: East
Posts: 1,252
Default

Originally Posted by quekky
just go for the B+W MRC, only cost $60+ and u wun regret it
Agreed. The B+W MRC is really good. Just got one myself and ditched a cheap filter that AP palmed off on me.
deadpixel is offline  
Old 1st July 2004   #7
roygoh
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Northwest
Posts: 5,042
Default

Originally Posted by deadpixel
Agreed. The B+W MRC is really good. Just got one myself and ditched a cheap filter that AP palmed off on me.
Can you share what improvements you saw by switching to B+W from the cheap filter? Less vignetting? Better image (in what sense)?

Do you have images straight off the camera that can demonstrate the improvement?

I am using a Hoya UV-Guard on my 18-70mm and would like to know what I am missing by not using a better grade filter.

Thanks!

Roy
__________________
As complexity rises, precise statements lose meaning and meaningful statements lose precision.
roygoh is offline  
Old 2nd July 2004   #8
deadpixel
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: East
Posts: 1,252
Default

I'm comparing this to the cheapo Tokina filter that I had to get in a hurry, so a good Hoya filter may give you good value for money results too.

Compared to the Tokina, there's a little less vignetting experienced with this filter when the lens is at its widest angle and aperture, but if you shoot in RAW and have NC 4.1, you'd be able to use the Vignette Control feature to remove the problem.

The overall appearence of the colors in the photos also appear a little clearer though (to be fair) it may be due to different weather and lighting conditions, however, I'm pretty sure it is not. I'll have to find some time to do a few test shots with similar subjects and conditions.


Originally Posted by roygoh
Can you share what improvements you saw by switching to B+W from the cheap filter? Less vignetting? Better image (in what sense)?

Do you have images straight off the camera that can demonstrate the improvement?

I am using a Hoya UV-Guard on my 18-70mm and would like to know what I am missing by not using a better grade filter.

Thanks!

Roy

Last edited by deadpixel; 2nd July 2004 at 12:49 AM.
deadpixel is offline  
Old 2nd July 2004   #9
roygoh
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Northwest
Posts: 5,042
Default

Thanks for the info! Looking forward to see some comparison shots from you.

- Roy
__________________
As complexity rises, precise statements lose meaning and meaningful statements lose precision.
roygoh is offline  
Old 2nd July 2004   #10
Ajit
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 28
Arrow

Hi Guys,

I was quoted $68 for Hoya UV Pro 1 and $85 for the B+W UV filter...... Are these prices ok ? For the normal Hoya UV filter, they mentioned that it's available for $35-40......
Ajit is offline  
Old 2nd July 2004   #11
espn
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
Default

Go for the B+W. $85's a bit too ex I think, where did you get the quotes from?
espn is offline  
Old 2nd July 2004   #12
Ajit
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 28
Default

John 3:15 at Funan quoted me these price...not ready to bargain....
CP, TCW, MS Color have no stock of 67mm filters....
Ajit is offline  
Old 2nd July 2004   #13
mercurio
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 70
Default B+W nt worth it

Get the Hoya super HMC. There is no visual increase in the
vigneting of the lens (sad to say the lens itself has vignetting at low light wide angle and full (or near full) aperture). Also no color change and metering problem. I got it for $39.6 at M+S.

I also try Hoya $20 UV and the $34 HMC. Both give problems at wide angle, full aperture and low light. For UV, there is color change at angle and low light.

Forget others UV filters.
mercurio is offline  
Old 2nd July 2004   #14
espn
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
Default

Originally Posted by Ajit
John 3:15 at Funan quoted me these price...not ready to bargain....
CP, TCW, MS Color have no stock of 67mm filters....
No wonder. The price is a bit too high, I think most have gotten it at about $50-$60? Check the threads.




Originally Posted by mercurio
Get the Hoya super HMC. There is no visual increase in the
vigneting of the lens (sad to say the lens itself has vignetting at low light wide angle and full (or near full) aperture). Also no color change and metering problem. I got it for $39.6 at M+S.

I also try Hoya $20 UV and the $34 HMC. Both give problems at wide angle, full aperture and low light. For UV, there is color change at angle and low light.

Forget others UV filters.
It's not vignetting. Forget other UV? Wanna do a side by side comparison of B+W/Nikon L37C UV on a piece of newspaper?
espn is offline  
Old 2nd July 2004   #15
goering
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 435
Default

Originally Posted by roygoh
Thanks for the info! Looking forward to see some comparison shots from you.

- Roy
Comparison shots would probably not show much difference - to be honest.

However, if you take the 2 filters (one cheapo and the other a good one) and place them side by side over something such as a newspaper, you can see that the transmission is better for the good filter. It's not a world of difference but is visible

Since the filter is a permanent attachment, it still makes good sense to have a good filter as you would want to wear a pair of spectacles with very clear vision
goering is offline  
Old 2nd July 2004   #16
deadpixel
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: East
Posts: 1,252
Default

$85 for B+W?

They're only asking for S$60 at CP.


Originally Posted by Ajit
Hi Guys,

I was quoted $68 for Hoya UV Pro 1 and $85 for the B+W UV filter...... Are these prices ok ? For the normal Hoya UV filter, they mentioned that it's available for $35-40......
deadpixel is offline  
Old 2nd July 2004   #17
Hewland
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 178
Default

Originally Posted by deadpixel
$85 for B+W?

They're only asking for S$60 at CP.

I cheapskate so bought a Hoya
Hewland is offline  
Old 5th July 2004   #18
Ajit
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 28
Default

Looks like all shops are out of stock for 67mm filter. Stock only expected to arrive in mid-July. Have to Shoot without filter till then but i am afraid of damaging the lens (scratches)......
If any one of you have recently bought a 67mm UV filter (Hoya Super HMC / B+W), can you please let me know which shop you got it from and what price.....
Ajit is offline  
Old 5th July 2004   #19
Dennis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,862
Default

Hi Ajit, TK have B&W ones (Not sure if they also have Hoya), just got one on 2 Jul (Fri) for the 18-70 lens.


Originally Posted by Ajit
Looks like all shops are out of stock for 67mm filter. Stock only expected to arrive in mid-July. Have to Shoot without filter till then but i am afraid of damaging the lens (scratches)......
If any one of you have recently bought a 67mm UV filter (Hoya Super HMC / B+W), can you please let me know which shop you got it from and what price.....
Dennis is offline  
Old 5th July 2004   #20
mpenza
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
Default

There's a shop "Alex"(?) on second floor of Peninsula that sells Kenko multicoated 67mm UV filters. He quoted me $25 last I went. not too sure how good they are compared to Hoya HMC though.
mpenza is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.13183 seconds with 7 queries