![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 28
|
Hi,
If I want to buy a filter just to protect the "AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED " lens, shall I go for a UV filter or Skylight one. Which will have the least impact on the picture, f stops etc...... Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,862
|
I would have the UV ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: East
Posts: 1,252
|
For protection, just go with either the UV or an HMC.
UV, Skylight and HMC filters are clear so do not affect the f-stop. Skylight filters have a slight pink cast to them and will affect the color of your shots. What you need to be concerned about isn't the impact on the f-stops but the overall quality of your images and vignetting if you buy cheap filters.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: www.fuzzyeyeballs.com
Posts: 6,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: www.irphotography.com
Posts: 1,377
|
just go for the B+W MRC, only cost $60+ and u wun regret it
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: East
Posts: 1,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Northwest
Posts: 5,042
|
Do you have images straight off the camera that can demonstrate the improvement? I am using a Hoya UV-Guard on my 18-70mm and would like to know what I am missing by not using a better grade filter. Thanks! Roy
__________________
As complexity rises, precise statements lose meaning and meaningful statements lose precision. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: East
Posts: 1,252
|
I'm comparing this to the cheapo Tokina filter that I had to get in a hurry, so a good Hoya filter may give you good value for money results too.
Compared to the Tokina, there's a little less vignetting experienced with this filter when the lens is at its widest angle and aperture, but if you shoot in RAW and have NC 4.1, you'd be able to use the Vignette Control feature to remove the problem. The overall appearence of the colors in the photos also appear a little clearer though (to be fair) it may be due to different weather and lighting conditions, however, I'm pretty sure it is not. I'll have to find some time to do a few test shots with similar subjects and conditions.
Last edited by deadpixel; 2nd July 2004 at 12:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Northwest
Posts: 5,042
|
Thanks for the info! Looking forward to see some comparison shots from you.
- Roy
__________________
As complexity rises, precise statements lose meaning and meaningful statements lose precision. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 28
|
Hi Guys,
I was quoted $68 for Hoya UV Pro 1 and $85 for the B+W UV filter...... Are these prices ok ? For the normal Hoya UV filter, they mentioned that it's available for $35-40...... |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
Go for the B+W. $85's a bit too ex I think, where did you get the quotes from?
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 28
|
John 3:15 at Funan quoted me these price...not ready to bargain....
CP, TCW, MS Color have no stock of 67mm filters.... |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 70
|
Get the Hoya super HMC. There is no visual increase in the
vigneting of the lens (sad to say the lens itself has vignetting at low light wide angle and full (or near full) aperture). Also no color change and metering problem. I got it for $39.6 at M+S. I also try Hoya $20 UV and the $34 HMC. Both give problems at wide angle, full aperture and low light. For UV, there is color change at angle and low light. Forget others UV filters. |
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 435
|
However, if you take the 2 filters (one cheapo and the other a good one) and place them side by side over something such as a newspaper, you can see that the transmission is better for the good filter. It's not a world of difference but is visible Since the filter is a permanent attachment, it still makes good sense to have a good filter as you would want to wear a pair of spectacles with very clear vision |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: East
Posts: 1,252
|
$85 for B+W?
![]() They're only asking for S$60 at CP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 178
|
I cheapskate so bought a Hoya |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 28
|
Looks like all shops are out of stock for 67mm filter. Stock only expected to arrive in mid-July. Have to Shoot without filter till then but i am afraid of damaging the lens (scratches)......
If any one of you have recently bought a 67mm UV filter (Hoya Super HMC / B+W), can you please let me know which shop you got it from and what price..... |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,862
|
Hi Ajit, TK have B&W ones (Not sure if they also have Hoya), just got one on 2 Jul (Fri) for the 18-70 lens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
There's a shop "Alex"(?) on second floor of Peninsula that sells Kenko multicoated 67mm UV filters. He quoted me $25 last I went. not too sure how good they are compared to Hoya HMC though.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|