Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: extension tube

  1. #1

    Default extension tube

    hi all,

    would like to check if extension tube is good for macro?
    Nikon D60|D7000|MB-D11|18-55VR|18-105VR|55-200VR|50 F1.8|Di866
    http://**********/u2jTNE

  2. #2
    Member Limsbros's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sembawang
    Posts
    255

    Default Re: extension tube

    Try google... what is your objective or intend for using extension tube...Yes it is good for macro only if you know why you want to add extension tube. You can use it on non-macro lens or macro lens etc..

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TonyOng View Post
    hi all,

    would like to check if extension tube is good for macro?
    There are several ways to do Macro Photography, such as usage of extension tube.

    Only with a dedicated macro lens, you could achieve the 1:1 life size magnification and optimum sharpness.
    NIKON D90 (2008-2010), D700 (2010-2012), D800 (2012-2014), DF (Dec 2013-Sep 2017)

  4. #4

    Default Re: extension tube

    Quote Originally Posted by jeff7id View Post
    Only with a dedicated macro lens, you could achieve the 1:1 life size magnification and optimum sharpness.
    This statement is inaccurate and mis-leading .
    Macro lenses achieve 1:1 by extension as well, so technically it is no different from use of extension tubes.
    The issue of "optimum sharpness" is highly debateable.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,571

    Default Re: extension tube

    Extension tube is to assist the lens by bringing up magnification, useful for closeup photography. Of course it is good way - as in a cheaper alternative to boost magnification rather than owning a dedicated macro lens. Likely you going to manual focus your lens unless you get Kenko extension tubes. You'll lose light when you put something between your lens and camera sensor. A book that you can read up more is Bryan Peterson's Understanding Closeup Photography.

  6. #6

    Default Re: extension tube

    Quote Originally Posted by relakbro View Post
    This statement is inaccurate and mis-leading .
    Macro lenses achieve 1:1 by extension as well, so technically it is no different from use of extension tubes.
    The issue of "optimum sharpness" is highly debateable.
    So how many extension tubes do you want to stack on non-macro lens to achieve 1:1 magnification ? The more tubes you stack, the lower the quality of the picture.

    That's why I say to directly choose dedicated 1:1 macro lens to achieve the optimum sharpness.
    NIKON D90 (2008-2010), D700 (2010-2012), D800 (2012-2014), DF (Dec 2013-Sep 2017)

  7. #7

    Default Re: extension tube

    Quote Originally Posted by jeff7id View Post
    The more tubes you stack, the lower the quality of the picture.
    Extension tubes do not have any glass elements so I don't know where you are getting this conclusion from.
    Are you confusing extension tubes with teleconvertors (perhaps)?

    Sounds like you have experience in this field, so as the TS is asking for info, perhaps it would help if you explain yourself in more details, rather than short conclusive statements, as it is difficult to understand when you are so brief.

    As for how much extension is required, I believe the simple formula is:
    increase in magnification = the extension distance divided by the lens focal length

    You still need to know what is your lens' max magnification (at min focal distance) before you can figure out how much extension to add to get to 1:1.

    This topic is best to be explained in detail by books and wmayeo has suggested a good reference.

  8. #8

    Default Re: extension tube

    thanks all for all the info.. will go and pick up the book to do some read up.
    Nikon D60|D7000|MB-D11|18-55VR|18-105VR|55-200VR|50 F1.8|Di866
    http://**********/u2jTNE

  9. #9

    Default Re: extension tube

    Dear jeff7id, the more extension tubes you add, the less light reaches the sensor. There is no degradation of image quality.
    Can you please state the equipment you used? Or are you simply hypothesizing?

    I've shot with 4x5's for close to 20 years. The bellows simply distance the same lens from the film plane, when extended. None of any 4x5 lenses are dedicated closeup/ macro/ micro. Yet every single one of them shoots absolutely brilliant closeup images. it's not 1:1. It's more like 25:1 (25x) magnification, especially when we were shooting for jewelery clients. Don't forget that the film is 4 inches by 5 inches large.

  10. #10

    Default Re: extension tube

    Actually, I am a portrait photographer and interested to shoot models only.
    I have used macro lenses such as 60mm macro, 105mm macro for portrait purpose.
    I also do close up shoot, to show the beauty of model face.

    http://imaging.nikon.com/products/im...e/30/index.htm
    Quotes from Nikon website: "Even natural portraits are possible using Micro lenses."

    As for portrait, I just use macro lens and such an extension tube is not required.
    That's why I recommend only a dedicated macro lens to TS.

    Our shooting style is just different. Don't mean to confuse TS though....
    Last edited by jeff7id; 20th November 2010 at 02:20 AM.
    NIKON D90 (2008-2010), D700 (2010-2012), D800 (2012-2014), DF (Dec 2013-Sep 2017)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •