|
|
18th June 2004
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Singapore, Bedok
Posts: 1,801
|
Heavy vignetting, flare, no eye contact, slanted horizon, blown sky, dirty negative, ... sorry, i don't quite get this one... pinhole camera???
|
|
|
18th June 2004
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: yishun
Posts: 2,469
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
|
18th June 2004
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: here and there
Posts: 748
|
shot from the slope, was losing my footing and starting to slide down. |
|
|
|
|
19th June 2004
|
#5 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,816
|
no offence, but this thread gave me an idea to toy with..
i'm gonna try to create the most technically wrong photo that i can come up with... |
|
|
|
19th June 2004
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
20th June 2004
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: here and there
Posts: 748
|
 feel free to try. in my book, technically wrong doesn't necessarily mean a bad photo. |
|
|
|
|
21st June 2004
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Singapore, Bedok
Posts: 1,801
|
Oh, i just noticed that it's the negative that's slanted, not the picture. The horizontal wall in the background is actually quite parallel to the negative's top and bottom edges.
And that the 'flare spot' in the picture is possibly not a flare spot but a scanning artifect, bcoz the flare spot actually extends outside the picture area in the negative. But technicals aside, i'm still don't quite 'understand' the pic. |
|
|
|
21st June 2004
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Singapore, Bedok
Posts: 1,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
21st June 2004
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,396
|
Yep...
Prefectly imperfect photos are difficult to take. |
|
|
|
21st June 2004
|
#11 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,097
|
 |
|
|
|
|
21st June 2004
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: here and there
Posts: 748
|
|
|
|
|
|
21st June 2004
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 813
|
i like your idea of using parts of the film to actually frame up the picture!
it gives it a different touch... nothing right or wrong about this picture, but definitely stands out  |
|
|
|
21st June 2004
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: here and there
Posts: 748
|
here's another one where i scanned the negative and inverted it with PS. the picture in the contact print for this negative came out way under exposed, it was practically all black, as the guy was sleeping in the shade.
 but by using this method, i'm able to get a picture that's interesting and printable, in my humble opinion. |
|
|
|
24th June 2004
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 265
|
Cool. Just cool.
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
