Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: truth about pro photographers?

  1. #21

    Default Re: truth about pro photographers?

    Quote Originally Posted by anuar ahmad View Post
    Don't worry...i'm still using close to a decade old dslr.

    Dont worry, you are not alone. I dont even have a SLR. My set up both body & lens are made in 1957

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Jurong
    Posts
    2,036

    Default Re: truth about pro photographers?

    This is what i call pro photographer .
    http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...d.php?t=954783
    5D3|35L|50f1.8II|580EXII

  3. #23

    Default Re: truth about pro photographers?

    Quote Originally Posted by commonjunks View Post
    This is what i call pro photographer .
    http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...d.php?t=954783
    omg, I need to learn my PP from the pg

    I don't even know how to make an image look like those lol, wonder what he did to his hue/saturation sliders and how many masks he used...

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Tampines
    Posts
    2,624

    Default Re: truth about pro photographers?

    Quote Originally Posted by anuar ahmad View Post
    Don't worry...i'm still using close to a decade old dslr. I'll be happy if 10% of the images from a 4gb card turned out right which i'll be glad to share.

    Am still using an old film camera from the 70s & 80s with the processed negatives & slides converted to digital. With a good scanner, the image quality can supercede those from hi mp pro dslr.

    Even with a hp camera used correctly can produce excellent pictures that a pro couldn't.
    Totally agree.
    5D/5D3/Zeiss/28-85/100 F2/200 F4/50 F1.4/70-200/24-85/85 F1.4
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/zeisser/

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •