Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: NIKON AF-S 300mm f2.8 VR or AF-S 200-400 VR

  1. #21
    Senior Member ovaltinemilo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sin jia Po lah
    Posts
    2,820

    Default Re: NIKON AF-S 300mm f2.8 VR or AF-S 200-400 VR

    Quote Originally Posted by yumyum View Post
    would sigma 150-500 f5/6.3 enough for birding? do i need a TC ?
    pls advice, i m shooting with d200

    many many thanks
    The most is only a 1.4x TC since 1 stop light loss from f6.3 is quite alot. A body with better iso performance might get better with the combi of 500f6.3 + TC. but no guarantee wide open at 500mm is tad sharp.
    ...:::..::.Nikon.::.:::..
    RGB Metering & Focusing.

  2. #22
    Senior Member Hacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Cyberspace
    Posts
    4,239

    Default Re: NIKON AF-S 300mm f2.8 VR or AF-S 200-400 VR

    The 300mm f/2.8 is definitely sharper wide open. The 200-400mm VR II that I'm using right now is a great lens, not as sharp and heavier. But the flexibility of the zoom drew me to the lens.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •