![]() |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 876
|
if its good enough, still need neatimage?
I mean, I find neatimage making my pics abit softer..prefer not to use it.. even in ISO1600.. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,470
|
i usually use neatimage on images with a dominant colour. I don't find NI making the image softer. Again, sharpness is a relative thing. My tolerance for softness is very high.
Never cared about noise when I convert to B/W or desaturate my photos. Now with NI, I can shoot with auto ISO and can de-noise if needed. Your mileage may differ. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 876
|
i guess so... cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,546
|
the original un-NIed image is good enuff for me. looks like D70's noise control iso1600 is pretty darned good.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,116
|
Actually, i don't see noise in the original image. Should be able to print up to 5R with no impact on noise (coz printing itself would have "noise").
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|