Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

  1. #1

    Default Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    OK, weird question – I know. But do you find you typically underexpose or overexpose your photos. Here’s why I ask. Believe it or not, It makes a difference when it comes to your Lightroom edits. Years ago, I read a white paper from the late Bruce Fraser. Bruce was a pioneer in many aspects of digital imaging and I encourage you to give this white paper a read (it’s actually a pretty quick read too). Now, knowing that many of you won’t read it and the fact that white papers can get REALLY technical, I’ll paraphrase.

    Bruce basically writes that our cameras capture a lot of information in the highlights. Way more than we think. He points out that it’s typically best to try to capture as much of the highlight information as possible without actually blowing out the highlights. Why? Because programs like Lightroom and Camera Raw are so good at bringing back highlight detail, while trying to bring back detail in the shadows and dark areas can often have negative effects on your photos (there’s lots of noise in the shadows).

    I read this about 4 or 5 years ago and I instantly became happier with my photography and post processing. It was great to finally bring the Exposure slider toward the left a little instead of always increasing Exposure or Fill Light (I used to underexpose because I was always afraid of coming anywhere close to that histogram touching the right side). When I’m outdoors my Exposure Compensation on my camera is always set to at least +1/3 or +2/3 and I’ll push the exposure as far toward clipping as I can get if I know there’s some shadowy areas in the photo.

    Now before you answer the question keep this in mind. First, the question is just for fun. I’m simply curious so please don’t read too much into it and write a long comment telling me all about gamma and compressive nonlinearity (I hate the word gamma by the way). Also, if you’re shooting in the studio a lot this doesn’t apply to you as much. For me, I find I don’t have to modify many settings on my studio portraits. I’d get that done with the lighting in the studio. I’m talking about things like outdoor portraits, sports, travel, and landscape photography where we don’t always have the ability to balance light in all areas of the photo to get the exact proper exposure. So we have to make a choice – underexpose to make sure you capture all of the highlight detail or overexpose to make sure you capture the shadow detail?




    More...

  2. #2

    Default Re: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    interesting.. u have to consider that sometimes, it is not that we underexpose the picture, but rather we have no choice due to the poor lighting conditions and we have to get a hand-holdable shutterspeed. Of course when i m outside shooting, i tend to overexpose the picture by pushing up the exposure compensation cos the metering of the camera will try to expose the picture equally, making the faces too dark
    Canon 550D|15-85|100L|430EX II|Flickr

  3. #3
    Moderator ed9119's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    10,929
    Blog Entries
    26

    Default Re: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    with the older cheaper dslrs (eg 350D) with tight DR limits and without live histogram or spot metering then.... I always dialed down 1/2 stop...... nowadays i leave EV at '0' and lock AE when I like what the histogram shows

    just me
    Last edited by ed9119; 17th August 2010 at 10:37 PM.
    shaddap and just shoot .... up close
    Walkeast

  4. #4

    Default Re: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    depends on the type of shot.

    For indoor shots, I tend to underexpose very slightly as I know I can get back the detail using software.

    For outdoor shots during the day, I tend to overexpose very slightly to ensure I get enough detail in the background (and usually end up with an overexposed sky).

    For night shots outdoors, I settle for as close as I can get to +/-0 while still handheld.

    For fireworks, I use bulb mode and a timer and hope for the best

    RAW and software has brought back a number of shot I thought were garbage when looking at them on camera. Peace and love to the brightness slider
    7D | 17-55 2.8 | 18-135 | 50 1.4
    5DMkII | 14 L 2.8 | 24-105 L 4 | 70-200 L 2.8 | 100 L 2.8 Macro

  5. #5

    Default Re: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    I am by no means an experienced DSLR user. But as someone shooting JPEG and not raw, I either underexpose a little or bracket. While it is possible to recover details from highlights, they do not have a pleasing colour and usually turn out greyish (or maybe my PP skill is below par). And equivalent amount of underexposure while giving out noise, does appear to be more natural and noise, being inherent in ISO400 and above, can be easily removed without noticeable loss in detail (using NeatImage and equiv. Not sure about PS though)

  6. #6
    Senior Member ovaltinemilo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sin jia Po lah
    Posts
    2,820

    Default Re: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    whenever possible, tend to overexpose slightly. if DR too large, no choice..just make sure no blinkies...
    ...:::..::.Nikon.::.:::..
    RGB Metering & Focusing.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    Tend to overexpose for portraiture... And underexpose for general/landscape photography...
    Playing with M43.

  8. #8
    Senior Member zac08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    East
    Posts
    11,755

    Default Re: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    I tend to underexpose for most of my shots..
    Michael Lim
    My Flickr Site

  9. #9

    Default Re: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    Is this even supposed to be in the newbie section? Haha. Just saying...

    Edited : sorry got into the wrong section of the forum! :/
    Last edited by gohjialong; 18th August 2010 at 10:30 PM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member albertri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    6,304

    Default Re: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    Quote Originally Posted by Akatsuki View Post
    Tend to overexpose for portraiture... And underexpose for general/landscape photography...
    Im new at phtography I also do the same overexpose portraits shots and undrexpose a landscapes specially bright day.

  11. #11
    Member gymak90's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Far North
    Posts
    1,448

    Default Re: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    I tend to underexpose my shots by 0.3 stop. I was told this helps in getting saturated colours. Maybe this works only for film??

    I actually thought highlights were harder to recover.
    The best things in life are free.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    I do both.. and digital blend to get a good exposure. =)

  13. #13
    Senior Member wildcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Bedok
    Posts
    3,268

    Default Re: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    I find it easier to recover from shadows than overblown highlights. Thus if I only have a choice of one, I will choose to under-expose.

    With choice, I will bracket and HDR+exposure blend also, but that is not always possible. Plus under-exposing normally gives me more pre-PP pleasing pictures with my camera.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Numnumball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Central
    Posts
    13,914

    Default Re: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    I do both as well.. merely for digital blending purposes..
    Personally felt that nikon cams has a tendency to under expose the midtone gray by a mere bit.. so will dial in +0.3 for most of my workflow..
    Blown highlights are tougher to recover compared to shadows details. so at times will underexpose to get the results i want
    I turned PRO in diaper chg!
    My Flickr|My Son

  15. #15
    Moderator daredevil123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    lil red dot
    Posts
    21,627
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Do you tend to under or over expose your photos?

    If I am not blending, and aiming for a 1 shot picture, I will over-expose, aka Exposing to the right. While making sure no highlights are clipped. Then I reduce the exposure in PP. Yes, you really do get a lot more details that way. The key is not to blow the highlights.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •