![]() |
|
|||||||
| Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 578
|
Hi all,
I was wondering can i use or which should i use any 1.4x tele converter lens for my Canon EOS 10D to be use on a normal Canon EF 28~105mm f3.5-4 USM MK II lens? Hope to hear from you guys soon, thanks in advance ![]() Cheers to all, Henry |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,422
|
not recommended...
the AF may fail due to the change in effective aperture to f/4.5-6.7 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Western side of Singapore
Posts: 1,163
|
Teleconvertors are optimised for longer telephotos. You might not be too happy with the results, and the teleconvertor might not actually fit well on your 28-105. Not to sure about Canon, but for Nikon, certain lenses' rear element, when zooming or focussing, would hit the teleconvertor. You can try...
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pasir ris
Posts: 681
|
i find the lens soft enough on its own without any help. i wont recomend doing it...
if u need a 70 200 range... just get an old 70-210 (3.5-4.5 oso!) its known to be the "other half" to this polycarbonate 28-105, i believe a travel series by canon? the 100-300 oso. looks exactly like the 70 210 just that its slower. IMHO, the price of a telecon cld get u one of the above 2nd hand. and a price of an original canon telecon wld of cos get u more. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,573
|
can get the 75-300 IS
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 109
|
Well, I got a 2x tc but no happy with the result thus got a 100-400 L IS USM too to meet my zoom needs. On my 10D it become 640mm
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
A kenko pro 300 1.4x will fit, so will some other cheaper teles but there would be some degradation of image quality.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 578
|
WOW
thanks for all the advice, hmm i still don't know which to get as i have a budget hehehe, thanks again. Anyway how much is a Kenko Pro 300 1.4x cost? Where can i get it from? Thanks.Cheers to all and all haha, Henry |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 109
|
you might want to read this to know more abt Kenko Pro 300 1.4x http://www.adorama.com/KN14XPEOS.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore (SengKang)
Posts: 2,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
actually, if you want the range, go for the sigma 70-300 f4-5.6 APO Macro Super II. costs ~$340 and will work better than the 28-105+1.4x tele.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 578
|
Cheers to all hehe, Henry |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|