ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Photo Galleries > Land/City-scapes and Travel

Land/City-scapes and Travel The world around us, and the beautiful surroundings we live in.


 
Thread Tools
Old 29th April 2004   #1
benchuatl
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South
Posts: 49
Default Please comments



What do u think about this photo?

All comments are welcome......
benchuatl is offline  
Old 29th April 2004   #2
toomz
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 418
Default

Hmm.. can't quite make out the details on the dragon... a bit underexposed?
Or isit my monitor?
toomz is offline  
Old 29th April 2004   #3
benchuatl
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South
Posts: 49
Default

Originally Posted by toomz
Hmm.. can't quite make out the details on the dragon... a bit underexposed?
Or isit my monitor?
Need to print out b4 I know... My screen too... appeared underexpose but printing turns out well, can u enlighten me on how to set the screen colour to match the real? By the way I am using HP 1350 (free from starhub)....

Thanks anyway.
benchuatl is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 29th April 2004   #4
toomz
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 418
Default

Originally Posted by benchuatl
Need to print out b4 I know... My screen too... appeared underexpose but printing turns out well, can u enlighten me on how to set the screen colour to match the real? By the way I am using HP 1350 (free from starhub)....

Thanks anyway.
ur monitor is not calibrated to ur printer tats why the diff. I'm no expert in tat.. Fellow experts pls come in
toomz is offline  
Old 29th April 2004   #5
Bryann
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 89
Default

Cannot make out what is it too.... hmmm

By the way, what is that ar?
Bryann is offline  
Old 30th April 2004   #6
boochap
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: sg - bukit ho swee
Posts: 1,303
Default

foreground subject is underexposed, no details. position a bit off, too far to the right.
backgroud is messy amd overexposed and distracting.
lighten up the foreground with a flash alone wouldnt help to improve the pix either.
boochap is offline  
Old 30th April 2004   #7
benchuatl
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South
Posts: 49
Default



How about this.... and these....





Thanks for all of ur comments, I would probably try again..
benchuatl is offline  
Old 30th April 2004   #8
scanner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,643
Default

1st thing, there are too much distractions around. It disorientate the audiences' focus. Ask yourself this qns? Where U wanted the audience to focus their eye on?

As for the 2nd pic, it looks much better and interesting. However, I find that there is too much spacing on the right. A tighter crop or next time re-orientate urself more towards the left side, might be more appealing?

Last pic, a tigher cropping will make it a good image. The shadow casted on the wall makes it a simple and interesting art.

BTW, all pic tends to be a bit underexposed, you might want to push the exposure a bit.

My 2 cents worth of inputs.
scanner is offline  
Old 30th April 2004   #9
benchuatl
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South
Posts: 49
Default

Originally Posted by scanner
1st thing, there are too much distractions around. It disorientate the audiences' focus. Ask yourself this qns? Where U wanted the audience to focus their eye on?

As for the 2nd pic, it looks much better and interesting. However, I find that there is too much spacing on the right. A tighter crop or next time re-orientate urself more towards the left side, might be more appealing?

Last pic, a tigher cropping will make it a good image. The shadow casted on the wall makes it a simple and interesting art.

BTW, all pic tends to be a bit underexposed, you might want to push the exposure a bit.

My 2 cents worth of inputs.

Thanks Scanner.. appreciated ur advices and pointers...
benchuatl is offline  
Old 30th April 2004   #10
Witness
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: www.maverickatwork.com
Posts: 6,768
Default

erhmmm dun mind me...i i tink the point is tt u used too little depth of field....totally dun know wats goin on....its very confusing ....
__________________
w maverick.photography
b maverick.blogging
Witness is offline  
Old 30th April 2004   #11
benchuatl
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South
Posts: 49
Default

Originally Posted by Witness
erhmmm dun mind me...i i tink the point is tt u used too little depth of field....totally dun know wats goin on....its very confusing ....
You are referring to which pics?

Thanks anyway
benchuatl is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.09561 seconds with 7 queries