I've experimented abit on my canon 18-55mm kit lens IS
Then I realise that it does not help much (well maybe is due to my holding which is not firm yet)
I take shots around in a room at ISO 100
Room has only 1 flourescent light
Anyway, my question is...
I'm thinking of buying a telephoto zoom of up to 300mm.
So I was wondering if I should go for the image stabiliser or the one without it.
.. and if assuming both has the same aperture range?
Will be using it to basically a variety of things, from nature all the way to human and performances.
Can pros out there advice?