10th April 2004, 12:21 AM
10th April 2004, 10:33 PM
Frankly, the first image is more of photoshop touch-up, which i think looks quite fake. Note how the effect has affect the hair and other areas. Not a good image to discuss about skin-tone in my opinion.
Originally Posted by groupwest
11th April 2004, 12:11 PM
I'm suspecting that the photos (at least the first one) are taken with a digital camera...
May be wrong, but the "feeling" and colours made me rethink whether the photos are taken with film.
If so, it depends very much on the camera's white balance and post-processing skills to get "nice" skin tones.
If it's film, me bad; maybe you can ask the original photographer instead?
11th April 2004, 06:43 PM
with lots of photoshop
it's just like that.
with film you can achieve what photoshop can do too in the printing stages... but it's too much time and usually not worth the effort.
11th April 2004, 07:00 PM
i think the first image is an touched up image. look at her face. it looks blured.
11th April 2004, 07:35 PM
Haha.. just found out there are 2 identical threads by groupwest..
Mod: Can merge the threads?